Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 16113765

Quality control for microarray experiments.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In this paper we give an overview of post-hybridization quality control methods for gene expression chips, including methods for the gene/spot level, the hybridization/chip level and the process level. We present quality control methods that can be applied after hybridization and image analysis, i.e. that use data from the chip experiment itself. Wet lab quality control steps, which should be applied before the probe is measured on a chip, are not discussed. This review is aimed towards statisticians and data analysts. METHODS: We give examples of some of the quality control measures available for spotted cDNA and Affymetrix GeneChips, the most common chip types. As quality control measures are technology and design-dependent, we will stress on methods that have the potential to be applied platform-independently. RESULTS: Quality control should identify poor quality chips or hybridizations, as well as faulty measurements for individual genes/spots. Additionally, high throughput laboratories processing several tens or hundreds of microarrays per week have the need for an appropriate process control to be able to identify changes in the production process as early as possible. CONCLUSION: Microarrays have become a standard research tool for biologists and medical researchers. As a consequence, there is a great need for standardized quality control, as false findings due to problem in data quality can lead to a substantial loss of resources.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

O Hartmann. 2005. Quality control for microarray experiments.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16113765/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Quantum-dot-labeled DNA probes for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in the microorganism Escherichia coli.

Semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) as a kind of nonisotopic biological labeling material have many unique fluorescent properties relative to conventional organic dyes and fluorescent proteins, such as composition- and size-dependent absorption and emission, a broad absorption spectrum, photostability, and single-dot sensitivity. These properties make them a promising stable and sensitive label, which can be used for long-term fluorescent tracking and subcellular location of genes and proteins. Here, a simple approach for the construction of QD-labeled DNA probes was developed by attaching thiol-ssDNA to QDs via a metal-thiol bond. The as-prepared QD-labeled DNA probes had high dispersivity, bioactivity, and specificity for hybridization. Based on such a kind of probe with a sequence complementary to multiple clone sites in plasmid pUC18, fluorescence in situ hybridization of the tiny bacterium Escherichia coli has been realized for the first time.

DNA Probes↗

A comparison of alternative 60-mer probe designs in an in-situ synthesized oligonucleotide microarray.

BACKGROUND: DNA microarrays have proven powerful for functional genomics studies. Several technologies exist for the generation of whole-genome arrays. It is well documented that 25mer probes directed against different regions of the same gene produce variable signal intensity values. However, the extent to which this is true for probes of greater length (60mers) is not well characterized. Moreover, this information has not previously been reported for whole-genome arrays designed against bacteria, whose genomes may differ substantially in characteristics directly affecting microarray performance. RESULTS: We report here an analysis of alternative 60mer probe designs for an in-situ synthesized oligonucleotide array for the GC rich, beta-proteobacterium Burkholderia cenocepacia. Probes were designed using the ArrayOligoSel3.5 software package and whole-genome microarrays synthesized by Agilent, Inc. using their in-situ, ink-jet technology platform. We first validated the quality of the microarrays as demonstrated by an average signal to noise ratio of >1000. Next, we determined that the variance of replicate probes (1178 total probes examined) of identical sequence was 3.8% whereas the variance of alternative probes (558 total alternative probes examined) designs was 9.5%. We determined that depending upon the definition, about 2.4% of replicate and 7.8% of alternative probes produced outlier conclusions. Finally, we determined none of the probe design subscores (GC content, internal repeat, binding energy and self annealment) produced by ArrayOligoSel3.5 were predictive or probes that produced outlier signals. CONCLUSION: Our analysis demonstrated that the use of multiple probes per target sequence is not essential for in-situ synthesized 60mer oligonucleotide arrays designed against bacteria. Although probes producing outlier signals were identified, the use of ratios results in less than 10% of such outlier conclusions. We also determined that several different measures commonly utilized in probe design were not predictive of outlier probes.

DNA Probes↗

Analytical assays based on detecting conformational changes of single molecules.

One common strategy for the detection of biomolecules is labeling either the target itself or an antibody that binds to it. Herein, a different approach, based on detecting the conformational change of a probe molecule induced by binding of the target is discussed. That is, what is being detected is not the presence of the target or the probe, but the conformational change of the probe. Recently, a single-molecule sensor has been developed that exploits this mechanism to detect hybridization of a single DNA oligomer to a DNA probe, as well as specific binding of a single protein to a DNA probe. Biomolecular recognition often involves large conformational changes of the molecules involved, and therefore this strategy may be applicable to other assays.

DNA Probes↗