Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 16111376

[Cross matching test].

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kiyoshi Kitamura. 2005. [Cross matching test].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16111376/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Non-invasive antenatal RHD typing.

The existence of cell free fetal DNA, derived from apoptotic syncytiotrophoblast, in the maternal circulation has opened new possibilities of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis. Although still some technical problems exists, especially the lack of a generic positive control on the presence of fetal DNA and the aspecific amplification of background maternal DNA, non-invasive prenatal RHD typing has been successfully introduced in several laboratories, especially in Europe. The diagnostic accuracy reaches>99%. In the Netherlands PCR guided administration of antenatal anti-D prophylaxis is cost-effective and nearby. In this review the main characteristics and applications of cell free fetal DNA are discussed, with an emphasis on prenatal RHD genotyping.

Blood Group Incompatibility↗

[Identification strategy of RHCE gene variants at the National Blood Group Reference Laboratory: impact on transfusion safety].

The RH blood group is the most polymorphic and immunogenic blood group system. The RH locus is composed of 2 highly homologous genes: the RHD gene encoding the D polypeptide; and the RHCE gene, encoding C or c together with either E or e polypeptides. Numerous variants exist for both RHD and RHCE genes. Among them we were interested in the serological and molecular definition of numerous pre-published RHCE variants encountered in different populations. The identification of these variants is crucial to ensure the transfusion safety for patients expressing these variants. Here we propose a procedure to identify some of them and discuss the adequate transfusion strategy. This procedure has enable us to identify new variants to be presented at the symposium.

Blood Group Incompatibility↗

Detection of red cell antibodies: comparison of two low ionic strength diluents.

Various low ionic strength diluents are used routinely for red cell alloantibody detection in the antiglobulin test to increase the rate of antibody association to antigen, thereby allowing a reduction in the incubation time while achieving optimal agglutination. Two commercial low ionic strength diluents (DiaMed ID-CellStab and Inverclyde LISS) were assessed using the DiaMed-ID LISS Coombs' microtube column system, to assess whether or not the choice of diluent influences red cell antibody detection. Effects of two low ionic strength diluents after 15-min incubation were assessed in 150 samples containing a wide range of typical red cell alloantibodies. Inverclyde LISS gave significantly higher reaction strengths in 25% of samples when compared with the same red cells suspended in ID-CellStab. Variation in reaction strengths ranged from 1+ to 2+, using Inverclyde LISS versus CellStab. Of 131 red cell alloantibodies directed against Rh, Kell, Kidd and Duffy antigens, Inverclyde LISS detected 90% after 15-min incubation, whereas 83% were detected with CellStab. This study suggests that Inverclyde LISS provides better red cell alloantibody detection than does ID-CellStab, and this may be due to the higher ionic strength of ID-CellStab.

Blood Group Incompatibility↗