PubMed · 16110633
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Maurie Markman. 2005. Supportive care.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-4410(04)22029-4
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
PURPOSE: Aprepitant, a selective neurokinin-1 (NK-1) receptor antagonist approved for the treatment and prevention of emesis caused by moderately and highly emetogenic chemotherapy, is an inhibitor, inducer, and substrate of the cytochrome P450 3194 pathway. The CYP3A4 pathway is the major pathway of the metabolism of vinorelbine, a vinca alkaloid frequently used in combination with cisplatin. Therefore, we studied the potential interaction of the aprepitant 3-day antiemetic regimen on the pharmacokinetics of vinorelbine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with metastatic solid tumors were included in this open-label, balanced, 2-period crossover study. In treatment arm A, vinorelbine (25 mg/m2 weekly) was administered alone, while in treatment arm B the same dose of vinorelbine was administered following the administration of the aprepitant antiemetic regimen on day 1 and alone on day 8. The antiemetic regimen of aprepitant was comprised of the following; on day 1: 125 mg aprepitant, 12 mg dexamethasone, and 32 mg ondansetron; on days 2 and 3: 80 mg aprepitant and 8 mg dexamethasone and on day 4: 8 mg dexamethasone. Blood samples for vinorelbine pharmacokinetic analysis were collected over 96 h. RESULTS: Two patients discontinued the study due to adverse events that were judged not to be drug-related. Complete pharmacokinetic data of vinorelbine administered alone and with the aprepitant antiemetic regimen were obtained in 12 patients. The mean plasma concentration profile of vinorelbine administered with aprepitant was identical to that following vinorelbine administered alone, with geometric mean vinorelbine plasma AUC ratios of treatment B day 1/treatment A day 1 and of treatment B day 8/treatment A day of 1.01 (0.93, 1.10) and 1.00 (0.92, 1.08), respectively. CONCLUSION: As the aprepitant antiemetic regimen has no detectable inhibitory or inductive effect on the pharmacokinetics of vinorelbine, aprepitant when added to a standard antiemetic regimen consisting of ondansetron and dexamethasone can be safely combined with vinorelbine at clinically recommended doses.
Postoperative vomiting (POV) remains one of the commonest causes of significant morbidity after tonsillectomy in children. A variety of prophylactic anti-emetic interventions have been reported, but there has only been a limited systematic review in this patient group. A systematic search was performed by using Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of prophylactic anti-emetic interventions in children undergoing tonsillectomy, with or without adenoidectomy. The outcome of interest was POV in the first 24 h. Summary estimates of the effect of each prophylactic anti-emetic strategy were derived using fixed effect meta-analysis. Where appropriate, dose-response effects were estimated using logistic regression and 22 articles were identified. Good evidence was found for the prophylactic anti-emetic effect of dexamethasone [odds ratio (OR) 0.23, 95% CI 0.16-0.33], and the serotinergic antagonists ondansetron (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.29-0.46), granisetron (OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.06-0.19), tropisetron (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.06-0.35) and dolasetron (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.1-0.59). Metoclopramide was also found to be efficacious (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34-0.77). There is not sufficient evidence to suggest that dimenhydrinate, perphenazine or droperidol, in the doses studied, are efficacious, nor were gastric aspiration or acupuncture. In conclusion, dexamethasone and the anti-serotinergic agents appear to be the most effective agents for the prophylaxis for POV in children undergoing tonsillectomy.
Functional gastrointestinal disorders such as functional (or non-ulcer) dyspepsia are characterized by a broad spectrum of symptoms referred to the upper abdomen without a detectable cause utilizing routine diagnostic measures. It is now believed that disordered gut function (including abnormalities like disturbances of motility such as postprandial fundic relaxation, gastric emptying and disturbed visceral sensory function) play a key role for the manifestation of these disorders. The underlying pathophysiology is not yet fully understood. However, the available data suggest that a number of factors may contribute to the manifestation of symptoms. These factors include environmental factors such as acute infections as trigger event, psychological stressors that may precede acute exacerbations and a genetic predisposition. Considering the large number of mechanisms, a treatment targeting a single mechanism is unlikely to be effective in all patients. Indeed, chemically defined treatments usually gain a 10-15% superiority over placebo. In recent years placebo-controlled studies have demonstrated superiority of a commercial multicomponent herbal preparation, STW 5, with the trade name Iberogast, for the treatment of patients with functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome. This phytopharmacon is a combination of nine plant extracts each with a number of different active constituents. Pharmacological studies have shown different effects of the single plant extracts on the (molecular) mechanisms which are discussed as underlying the manifestation of symptoms. Various well-controlled clinical trials have independently confirmed clinical efficacy and safety. The clinically efficacy of this multicomponent herbal preparation questions the current trend of highly targeted drug molecules that usually target one single receptor population while it has not been shown that a single receptor group plays a pivotal role for the control of symptoms. Herbal medicines are obtained from various plants and contain complex extracts with a large number of different active substances. While there are only limited head-to-head comparisons with conventional chemically defined medications, the combination of extracts with various gastrointestinal active ingredients appears to be advantageous for a heterogeneous condition such as functional dyspepsia.