How does the histone code work?

Michael S Cosgrove; Cynthia Wolberger

doi:10.1139/o05-137

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 16094450

How does the histone code work?

Michael S Cosgrove·Cynthia Wolberger

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Patterns of histone post-translational modifications correlate with distinct chromosomal states that regulate access to DNA, leading to the histone-code hypothesis. However, it is not clear how modification of flexible histone tails leads to changes in nucleosome dynamics and, thus, chromatin structure. The recent discovery that, like the flexible histone tails, the structured globular domain of the nucleosome core particle is also extensively modified adds a new and exciting dimension to the histone-code hypothesis, and calls for the re-examination of current models for the epigenetic regulation of chromatin structure. Here, we review these findings and other recent studies that suggest the structured globular domain of the nucleosome core particle plays a key role regulating chromatin dynamics.

Explore related subjects

Acetylation Animals Chromatin Histones Humans Methylation Models, Molecular Nucleosomes Phosphorylation Protein Processing, Post-Translational Journal Article Review

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Michael S Cosgrove, Cynthia Wolberger. 2005. How does the histone code work?. https://doi.org/10.1139/o05-137

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2019

Increased acetylation of H3K14 in the genomic regions that encode trained immunity enzymes in lysophosphatidylcholine-activated human aortic endothelial cells - Novel qualification markers for chronic disease risk factors and conditional DAMPs.

To test our hypothesis that proatherogenic lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) upregulates trained immunity pathways (TIPs) in human aortic endothelial cells (HAECs), we conducted an intensive analyses on our RNA-Seq data and histone 3 lysine 14 acetylation (H3K14ac)-CHIP-Seq data, both performed on HAEC treated with LPC. Our analysis revealed that: 1) LPC induces upregulation of three TIPs including glycolysis enzymes (GE), mevalonate enzymes (ME), and acetyl-CoA generating enzymes (ACE); 2) LPC induces upregulation of 29% of 31 histone acetyltransferases, three of which acetylate H3K14; 3) LPC induces H3K14 acetylation (H3K14ac) in the genomic DNA that encodes LPC-induced TIP genes (79%) in comparison to that of in LPC-induced effector genes (43%) including ICAM-1; 4) TIP pathways are significantly different from that of EC activation effectors including adhesion molecule ICAM-1; 5) reactive oxygen species generating enzyme NOX2 deficiency decreases, but antioxidant transcription factor Nrf2 deficiency increases, the expressions of a few TIP genes and EC activation effector genes; and 6) LPC induced TIP genes(81%) favor inter-chromosomal long-range interactions (CLRI, trans-chromatin interaction) while LPC induced effector genes (65%) favor intra-chromosomal CLRIs (cis-chromatin interaction). Our findings demonstrated that proatherogenic lipids upregulate TIPs in HAECs, which are a new category of qualification markers for chronic disease risk factors and conditional DAMPs and potential mechanisms for acute inflammation transition to chronic ones. These novel insights may lead to identifications of new cardiovascular risk factors in upregulating TIPs in cardiovascular cells and novel therapeutic targets for the treatment of metabolic cardiovascular diseases, inflammation, and cancers. (total words: 245).

Acetylation↗

PubMed2007

Dual action on promoter demethylation and chromatin by an isothiocyanate restored GSTP1 silenced in prostate cancer.

Prostate carcinoma is characterized by the silencing of pi-class glutathione S-transferase gene (GSTP1), which encodes a detoxifying enzyme. The silencing of GSTP1, due to aberrant methylation at the CpG island in the promoter/5'-UTR, occurs in the vast majority of prostate tumors and precancerous lesions. It is a pathologic marker and probably an underlying cause of oxidative damage and inflammation at tumor initiation. Inhibition of the aberrant promoter methylation could therefore be an effective mean to prevent carcinogenesis. Several isothiocyanates, including phenethyl isothiocyanate (PEITC), found naturally in cruciferous vegetables, induced growth arrest and apoptosis in prostate cancer cells in culture and xenografts. The effects of PEITC to reactivate GSTP1 were investigated. Exposure of prostate cancer LNCaP cells to PEITC inhibited the activity and level of histone deacetylases (HDACs), and induced selective histone acetylation and methylation for chromatin unfolding. Concurrently PEITC demethylated the promoter and restored the unmethylated GSTP1 in both androgen-dependent and -independent LNCaP cancer cells to the level found in normal prostatic cells, as quantified by methylation-specific PCR and pyrosequencing. The dual action of PEITC on both the DNA and chromatin was more effective than 5'-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine, sodium butyrate, or trichostatin A (TSA), and may de-repress the methyl-binding domain (MBD) on gene transcription. The PEITC-mediated cross-talk between the DNA and chromatin in demethylating and reactivating GSTP1 genes, which is critically inactivated in prostate carcinogenesis, underlines a primary mechanism of cancer chemoprevention. Consequently, new approaches could be developed, with isothiocyanates to prevent and inhibit malignancies.

Acetylation↗

PubMed2006

Modifications of nuclear architecture and chromatin organization in ataxia telangiectasia cells are coupled to changes of gene transcription.

Ataxia telangiectasia (AT) is a rare genetic disorder caused by mutations of ATM gene. ATM kinase is a "master controller" of DNA-damage response and signal transducer of external stimuli. The complex role of ATM may explain the pleiotropic phenotype characteristic of AT syndrome, only partially. In our hypothesis, the multi-faceted phenotype of AT patients might depend on specific chromatin reorganization, which then reflects on the cellular transcription. We analyzed three lymphoblastoid cell-lines isolated from AT patients and one healthy control. The three-dimensional reconstruction disclosed marked changes of nuclear morphology and architecture in AT cells. When chromatin condensation was analyzed by differential scanning calorimetry, a remodeling was observed at the level of fiber folding and nucleosome conformation. Despite the structural differences, chromatin did not exhibit modifications of the average acetylation status in comparison to the control. Moreover, AT cells presented significant alterations in the transcription of genes involved in cell-cycle regulation and stress response. In AT3RM cells, the average chromatin decondensation went with the upregulation of c-fos, c-jun, and c-myc and downregulation of metallothioneins, p21 and p53. AT9RM and AT44RM cells were instead characterized by an increased chromatin condensation and presented a different transcription unbalance. Whereas in AT44RM all the considered genes were downregulated, in AT3RM the three oncogenes and metallothioneins were upregulated, but p53 and p21 were downregulated.

Acetylation↗