Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 16093772

Double-balloon endoscopy.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Our strategy for small intestinal diseases has dramatically been brushed up with a novel technique, double-balloon endoscopy, which exhibits extremely better insertability and maneuverability compared with conventional methods. Double-balloon endoscopy has a potential to change radically the approach for the small intestinal diseases in the future. In this article, the publications on double-balloon endoscope will be reviewed. RECENT FINDINGS: A double-balloon endoscope can be inserted into deeper portions of the small intestine via both oral and anal approaches, and allows endoscopic observation as well as treatment for the entire small intestine without general anesthesia. Reports have been made on this method's safety and low frequency of complication: it is very useful for diagnosis and treatment of small intestinal diseases, including small intestinal bleeding, small intestinal tumor, stenosis of small intestine, and polyposis syndrome. SUMMARY: The development of double-balloon endoscopy enabled observation and treatment in the entire small intestine. The double-balloon endoscopy has a potential to be a standard of enteroscopy by replacing conventional push enteroscopy and intraoperative enteroscopy. In the near future, the double-balloon endoscopy, together with the capsule endoscopy, will be essential modalities for the management of small intestinal diseases.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hironori Yamamoto, Hiroto Kita. 2005. Double-balloon endoscopy.. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mog.0000176440.03280.2a

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Clinical and endoscopic presentation of primary gastric lymphoma: a multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Although the stomach is the most frequent site of intestinal lymphomas, few data are available on both clinical endoscopic presentation of gastric lymphoma and possible differences between low-grade and high-grade lymphomas. METHODS: Clinical, histological and endoscopic records of consecutive patients with primary low-grade or high-grade lymphoma diagnosed were retrieved. Symptoms were categorized as 'alarm' or 'not alarm'. The endoscopic findings were classified as 'normal' or 'abnormal'. RESULTS: Overall, 144 patients with primary gastric lymphoma were detected, including 74 low-grade and 70 high-grade lymphoma. Alarm symptoms, particularly persistent vomiting and weight loss, were more frequently present in patients with high-grade lymphoma than in those with low-grade lymphoma (54% vs. 28%; P = 0.002). Low-grade lymphomas presented as 'normal' appearing mucosa (20% vs. 0%; P = 0.0004) or petechial haemorrhage in the fundus (9% vs. 0%; P = 0.02) more frequently than high-grade lymphomas, being also more often confined to the antrum (47% vs. 27%, P = 0.03) and associated with Helicobacter pylori infection (88% vs. 52%, P < 0.0001). On the contrary, high-grade lymphomas presented more commonly as ulcerative type (70% vs. 52%; P = 0.03), being also more frequently diagnosed in stage >I when compared with low-grade lymphomas (70% vs. 21%, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The overall prevalence of alarm symptoms is quite low and may be absent in more than 70% of patients with low-grade lymphoma.

Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal↗