Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 1606347

"Brain attack": an indication for thrombolysis?

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this article is to introduce the reader to the use of thrombolytics in the acute treatment of ischemic stroke. Theory and experimental evidence to support this approach are emphasized in addition to potential adverse effects of thrombolysis. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search was used to identify pertinent literature, including reviews. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were selected for detailed review if they involved stroke patients and addressed possible toxicities of therapy. Any abstracts concerning ongoing clinical trials also were reviewed. DATA EXTRACTION: Data from animal investigations using tissue plasminogen activator for the acute treatment of several models of cerebral ischemia were used to support the importance of early treatment (within six hours of symptom onset). Also, studies performed in animal models of stroke revealed that thrombolysis could be accomplished safely in acute ischemic stroke. All human studies published to data are anecdotal case reports, but point to the safety of thrombolysis if administered early. Reviews of ongoing multicenter trials are taken from published abstracts and proceedings. DATA SYNTHESIS: Thrombolysis holds promise as a hyperacute therapy for acute stroke; however, the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage remains. Crucial to the success of this and any other therapy for acute stroke is the ability to treat patients within hours of symptom onset. Also, the importance of concomitant medications such as heparin and aspirin has not yet been addressed. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacists need to be knowledgeable of new treatments of stroke and the risks associated with them. As patient educators, pharmacists can contribute to public awareness by promoting the early recognition of stroke symptoms. As pharmacotherapists, pharmacists need to understand the risks and the important monitoring parameters related to thrombolysis. The results of ongoing multicenter clinical trials are awaited before making a final judgment on the usefulness of thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S C Fagan, B J Zarowitz, S Robert. 1992. "Brain attack": an indication for thrombolysis?. https://doi.org/10.1177/106002809202600114

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Plasminogen activators: a comparison.

Thrombolytic drugs play a crucial role in the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, arterial thrombosis, acute thrombosis of retinal vessel, extensive coronary emboli, and peripheral vascular thromboembolism. Recognition of the importance of fibrinolytic system in thrombus resolution has resulted in the development of different fibrinolytic agents. Now a days several newer plasminogen activators with different pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties have been developed to treat thrombotic disease, which are fibrin specific with prolonged half-life and can be administered as a single bolus.

Anistreplase↗

Clinical and economic outcomes in thrombolytic treatment of peripheral arterial occlusive disease and deep venous thrombosis.

PURPOSE: Over the past 2 decades the use of thrombolytic therapy in the management of peripheral occlusive diseases, most notably peripheral arterial occlusion (PAO) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT), has become an accepted and potentially preferable alternative to surgery. We examined the period when urokinase was in short supply and subsequently unavailable, to explore potential differences in clinical outcome and economic effect between urokinase and recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data were obtained from the Premier Perspective Database, a broad clinical database that contains information on inpatient medical practices and resource use. The study population included all patients hospitalized in 1999 and 2000 with a primary or secondary diagnosis of PAO or DVT. Incidence was calculated for common adverse events, including bleeding complications, intracranial hemorrhage, amputation, and death. Cost data were also abstracted from the database, and are expressed as mean +/- SD. RESULTS: Demographic variables were similar in the urokinase and rt-PA groups. The rate of bleeding complications was similar in the urokinase and rt-PA groups. There were no intracranial hemorrhages in the urokinase group, compared with a rate of 1.5% in the rt-PA PAO group (P = .087) and 1.9% in the rt-PA DVT group (P = .175). The in-hospital mortality rate was lower in the urokinase-treated PAO subgroup (3.6% vs 8.5%; P = .026), but a similar finding in the DVT subgroup did not achieve statistical significance (4% vs 9.8%; P = .069). While pharmacy costs were greater in the urokinase-treated group (US 5472 dollars +/- US 5579 dollars vs US 3644 dollars +/- US 6009 dollars, P < .001; PAO subgroup, US 11,070 dollars +/- US 15,409 dollars vs US 6150 dollars +/- US 12,398 dollars, P = .003), overall hospital costs did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. This finding appears to be explained by a shorter hospital stay and reduced room and board costs in the urokinase-treated group. CONCLUSION: There were significant differences in outcome in patients with PAO and DVT who received treatment with urokinase and rt-PA. While pharmacy costs were significantly greater when urokinase was used, reduction in length of stay accounted for similar total hospital costs compared with rt-PA. These findings must be considered in the context of the retrospective nature of the analysis and the potential to use dosing regimens that differ from those in this study.

Anistreplase↗