Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 16050402

[Renal aging].

G Pérez Rivero·M P Torres Ruiz·I Serrano·H Bouarich·D Rodríguez Puyol
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Frequently underestimated, the deterioration of the renal function characteristic of the aging has very prominent clinical consequences. In the present article some aspects of the cellular and molecular biology of this process are analysed. The critical role of the oxidative stress and of TGFbeta are underlined. Determinant genetic factors are also mentioned. Such a knowledge can contribute to develop therapeutical strategies to prevent the decline of the.renal function that happens with the aging.

Explore related subjects

Age FactorsAgedAgingAnimalsAntioxidantsBlotting, NorthernExtracellular MatrixFree RadicalsGlomerular Filtration RateHumansKidneyKidney CortexOxidative StressRNA, MessengerRatsSuperoxide DismutaseTransforming Growth Factor betaComparative StudyEnglish AbstractJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Pérez Rivero, M P Torres Ruiz, I Serrano, H Bouarich, D Rodríguez Puyol. 2005. [Renal aging].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16050402/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Mean deviation fluctuation in eyes with stable Humphrey 24-2 visual fields.

AIM: To describe the expected fluctuation in the mean deviation (MD) scores on a large, long-term series of stable visual field reports for particular grades of defect in order to give clinicians an aid to the correct diagnosis of glaucomatous progression. METHOD: Visual field reports of subjects with five reliable consecutive Humphrey 24-2 visual fields, recorded over a period of at least 3 years, were scored using the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS) system. The AGIS scores of the first and last visual fields were required to be identical. RESULTS: A total of 202 eyes from 202 patients were used in the study, with a total of 1010 visual fields being used in the analysis. Visual fields with no defect (AGIS score 0) had a 99% confidence interval (CI) of 0.3 dB, mild defects 0.4 dB, moderate defects 0.8 dB, severe 1 dB, and 1.3 dB for end-stage defects when considering variation of MD scores. Using a one-way ANOVA incorporating all stages showed very little fluctuation throughout the series (P=0.96). The correlation between the CI and grade of field defect showed a good positive correlation (r=0.7, P=0.0003) indicating an increase in CI as field defects worsen. CONCLUSION: When considering a series of reliable visual fields in a stable eye, one should expect only very little fluctuation in the MD, indicating that an increase in the MD beyond that of the 99% CI described may suggest progression. The reliability indices of the visual field test should be regarded as a primary consideration when assessing visual fields.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2006

Detection rates of high-grade prostate cancer during subsequent screening visits. Results of the European Randomized Screening Study for Prostate Cancer.

Screening for prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests has led to a stage and grade shift as compared to the pre-PSA era. Effectiveness of screening for prostate cancer should be manifested by a reduction in detection rate of aggressive cancers during subsequent screening. In 6 centers of the European Randomized Screening study for Prostate Cancer, a total of 58,710 men were tested for prostate cancer. Screening centers differed with regard to age-range, screening interval and biopsy indications. During the 2nd visit, the proportion of Gleason score 6 cancers increased from 62.5 to 75%, mainly at the expense of Gleason score 7 cancers. High-grade (Gleason score 8-10) cancer detection rates varied per screening center during the 1st visit from 5.1 to 41.1, and during the 2nd visit from 6.4 to 29.3/10,000 men. The overall detection rate of high-grade cancers showed a reduction during the 2nd visit from 26 to 12/10,000 men, an effect mainly attributable to the screening center with the highest cancer detection rate (i.e. 507/10,000 men). Variations in detection rates among screening centers related among others to biopsy compliance and age range.

Age Factors↗