PubMed · 16044862
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Carolyn Mills. 2005. Developing the ability to lead.. https://doi.org/10.7748/nm2005.07.12.4.20.c2032
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
This paper reports on the contribution of six nurse educators to embed enquiry-led learning in a pre-registration nursing programme. Their focus was to evaluate student and facilitator perspectives of a hybrid model of problem-based learning, a form of enquiry-based learning and to focus on facilitators' perceptions of its longer-term utility with large student groups. Problem-based learning is an established learning strategy in healthcare internationally; however, insufficient evidence of its effectiveness with large groups of pre-registration students exists. Fourth Generation Evaluation was used, applying the Nominal Group Technique and Focus Group interviews, for data collection. In total, four groups representing different branches of pre-registration students (n = 121) and 15 facilitators participated. Students identified seven strengths and six areas for development related to problem-based learning. Equally, analysis of facilitators' discussions revealed several themes related to strengths and challenges. The consensus was that using enquiry aided the development of independent learning and encouraged deeper exploration of nursing and allied subject material. However, problems and frustrations were identified in relation to large numbers of groups, group dynamics, room and library resources and personal development. The implications of these findings for longer-term utility with large student groups are discussed.
There is wide variability in conditions included in state newborn screening (NBS) panels. The American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) was commissioned by Health Resources and Services Administration to develop a uniform NBS panel. Based on survey data, the ACMG committee proposed a panel that included cystic fibrosis (CF) and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency (G6PD), although G6PD was excluded from their final recommendations. We examine the attitudes of pediatricians and genetic counselors concerning screening for these two conditions. Data were collected as part of two different studies. Koopmans and Ross surveyed a random sample of 600 pediatricians from four states based on their NBS panels. Hiraki et al. surveyed genetic counselors who were members of the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) listserv. For this analysis, we compare the health care professionals' (HCPs') attitudes toward a universal NBS program for CF and G6PD, and how their support is influenced by state policy and personal interest in testing their own children. Two hundred twenty-three pediatricians and 267 genetic counselors provided partial or complete responses. Pediatricians are more likely to support NBS for both CF (84%) and G6PD (58%) than genetic counselors (56%, P < 0.001 and 39%, P < 0.001, respectively). Both pediatricians and genetic counselors' attitudes toward screening correlate with interest in screening their own children (P < 0.001). Interest in CF screening also correlates with state policy (pediatricians, P < 0.001; genetic counselors, P < 0.025). The correlation of professional recommendations with state policies and personal preferences reinforces the need for systematic evidence-based reviews rather than reliance on stakeholder opinions for developing national guidelines.
Addressing workforce issues has increasingly become a central feature of the organisation and management of public sector services internationally. The introduction of new work roles to public services is one approach advocated in response to recruitment and retention difficulties with professional staff and to increasingly complex services. This paper aims to critically examine UK's new roles policy in a health care context and explore its wider relevance by drawing on findings from an action research Ph.D. study aimed at exploring one such new role. This deliberately flexible role was held by individuals without a recognised qualification but study findings illustrate that, over the time, the role came to include the complex discharge planning work with patients previously carried out by registered nurses (RNs). The analysis presented highlights shortcomings in current new roles policy including the unacknowledged influence of competing policy goals; the erroneous assumption that defining who does what is clear-cut in practice; the lack of longer-term review of new roles; and the incompatibility between role flexibility and needs for role clarity. Policy makers, managers and practitioners are urged to acknowledge the subtleties and complexities of new work roles in the public sector highlighted by this study.