PubMed · 15995151
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Patricia Hayes. 2005. Communicating interdisciplinary research.. https://doi.org/10.1177/1054773805276584
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Cardiothoracic transplantation's success at prolonging life--and its economic costs--must be considered relative to its psychosocial benefits and costs. Moreover, psychosocial outcomes themselves influence long-term post-transplant morbidity and mortality rates. Although psychosocial outcomes--encompassing patients' physical, psychologic and social functioning, their management of their medical regimen and global quality of life--are the focus of many recent studies, these investigations have yet to yield many evidence-based interventions that are routinely applied to improve patient outcomes. Our goals were to summarize existing work on psychosocial outcomes, delineate areas requiring attention, offer recommendations for steps to advance the field, and thereby provide an impetus for the conduct of clinical trials of interventions to improve these outcomes. We concluded that research must generally shift away from descriptive studies and toward prospective and clinical trial designs to: (a) examine a full range of risk factors and clinical sequelae of patients' psychosocial status; and (b) evaluate the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions. In addition, these issues must be considered across all cardiothoracic recipients, including not only heart recipients but the less-studied populations of lung and heart-lung recipients, and must include longer-term (5+ years) outcomes than is typical in most work. The importance of adequately sized samples to ensure statistical power, and the need to construct study samples representative of the larger cardiothoracic transplant population, cannot be overestimated. Implementing these changes in research design and substantive focus will ensure that psychosocial outcomes research will have maximum impact on transplant recipients' clinical care.
BACKGROUND: The quality of data collected for the German nationwide quality assurance program in neonatology is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the quality of data collected by resident physicians with the quality of similar data collected by a dedicated research nurse. METHODS: Data for the German national quality assurance program in neonatology, derived from a cohort of 128 premature newborns with a birth weight <1500 g and/or a gestational age of <30 weeks born in the year 2003, were collected by residents taking care on these patients, and separately by a dedicated research nurse for the European Neonatal Network (EuroNeoNet). The data set collected for both networks included 44 common data items. The two data sets were compared, and any disagreement was double-checked using the chart of the baby to clarify which of the data entries was wrong. Furthermore, as data items are not equally important, a weighted analysis of all mistakes was performed. RESULTS: We found wrong data in 108/128 (84 %) of the data sets collected by the residents, and in 43/128 (34 %) of the data sets collected by the research nurse (p < 0.001). The weighted analysis revealed that residents made more mistakes in 30/44 of collected data items, whereas the research nurse did worse only in 1/44 data items. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the quality of data obtained by our resident physicians was worse than the quality of data obtained by our dedicated research nurse.
Healthcare professionals must find ways to accelerate the diffusion of knowledge within their organizations. Although nurses have extraordinary access to patient care data, they may underestimate their roles as data managers and innovators of change, and relinquish control of data to others. The authors discuss how nurses at an acute psychiatric hospital collect and report their own data to show the direct relationship between outcomes and excellence in nursing practice. Knowledge that is gained through practice is shared to inspire and sustain needed changes.