Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15971361

Mapping brains without coordinates.

Rolf Kötter·Egon Wanke
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Brain mapping has evolved considerably over the last century. While most emphasis has been placed on coordinate-based spatial atlases, coordinate-independent parcellation-based mapping is an important technique for accessing the multitude of structural and functional data that have been reported from invasive experiments, and provides for flexible and efficient representations of information. Here. we provide an introduction to motivations, concepts, techniques and implications of coordinate-independent mapping of microstructurally or functionally defined brain structures. In particular, we explain the problems of constructing mapping paths and finding adequate heuristics for their evaluation. We then introduce the three auxiliary concepts of acronym-based mapping (AM), of a generalized hierarchy (GM ontology), and of a topographically oriented regional map (RM) with adequate granularity for mapping between individual brains with different cortical folding and between humans and non-human primates. Examples from the CoCoMac database of primate brain connectivity demonstrate how these concepts enhance coordinate-independent mapping based on published relational statements. Finally, we discuss the strengths and weaknesses of spatial coordinate-based versus coordinate-independent microstructural brain mapping and show perspectives for a wider application of parcellation-based approaches in the integration of multi-model structural, functional, and clinical data.

Explore related subjects

Anatomy, ComparativeAnimalsBrain MappingCerebral CortexDatabases, FactualDecision TreesHumansPrimatesJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Rolf Kötter, Egon Wanke. 2005-04-29. Mapping brains without coordinates.. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1625

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

The serial transformation hypothesis of vertebrate origins: comment on "The new head hypothesis revisited".

In "The New Head Hypothesis Revisited," R.G. Northcutt (2005. J Exp Zool (Mol Dev Evol) 304B:274-297) evaluates the original postulates of this hypothesis (Northcutt and Gans, 1983. Quart Rev Biol 58:1-28). One of these postulates is that the brain-particularly the forebrain-evolved at essentially the same time as many neural crest and neurogenic placode derivatives-including sensory ganglia, dermal skeleton and sensory capsules of the head, and branchial arches. Northcutt's subsequent paper in 1996 concluded with the idea that transitional forms might not have occurred at the origin of vertebrates. Butler proposed a "Serial Transformation" hypothesis in 2000, which disputed the latter idea in that paired eyes and an enlarged brain (but lacking telencephalon) were envisioned to have been gained before elaboration of most neural crest and neurogenic placodal derivatives. In 2003, J. Mallatt and J.-Y. Chen analyzed fossils of the Cambrian animal Haikouella, which strongly support its affinity to craniates and aspects of several hypotheses, including Butler's transformational model, because although branchial bars are present, most other neural crest and placodal derivatives are absent, while paired eyes and an enlarged brain (but probably without telencephalon) are present. A more complete picture of vertebrate origins can be realized when the various hypotheses are constructively reconciled.

Anatomy, Comparative↗
PubMed2006

Foot bones from Omo: implications for hominid evolution.

We reanalyze a hominid talus and calcaneus from Omo dating to 2.2 mya and 2.36 mya, respectively. Although both specimens occur at different localities and times, both tarsals articulate well together, suggesting a single taxon on the basis of size and function. We attribute these foot bones to early Homo on the basis of their morphology. The more modern-like tarsal morphology of these Omo foot bones makes them very similar to a talus from Koobi Fora (KNM-ER 813), a specimen attributed to Homo rudolfensis or Homo erectus. Although the Omo tarsals are a million years younger than the oldest known foot bones from Hadar, both localities demonstrate anatomical differences representing two distinct morphological patterns. Although all known hominid tarsals demonstrate clear bipedal features, the tarsal features noted below suggest that biomechanical changes did occur over time, and that certain features are associated with different hominid lineages (especially the robust australopithecines).

Anatomy, Comparative↗
PubMed2006

Quantitative analysis of human mandibular shape using three-dimensional geometric morphometrics.

Human mandibular morphology is often thought to reflect mainly function, and to be of lesser value in studies of population history. Previous descriptions of human mandibles showed variation in ramal height and breadth to be the strongest difference among recent human groups. Several mandibular traits that differentiate Neanderthals from modern humans include greater robusticity, a receding symphysis, a large retromolar space, a rounder gonial area, an asymmetric mandibular notch, and a posteriorly positioned mental foramen in Neanderthals. Nevertheless, the degree to which these differences are part of modern human variation and/or are related to size and function remains unclear. The aim of this study was to document geographic and functional patterning in the mandibular shape of recent humans, to assess the effects of allometry on mandibular form, and to quantitatively evaluate proposed "Neanderthal" mandibular traits through comparison with samples of geographically diverse recent humans. Data were collected in the form of three-dimensional coordinates of 28 landmarks. Unlike previous studies, this analysis found that modern human mandibular shape exhibits considerable geographic patterning, with some aspects of mandibular morphology reflecting a climatic gradient, and others, a functional specialization. Population history is also reflected in mandibular form, albeit relatively weakly. Proposed "Neanderthal" traits were found to separate Neanderthal from modern human mandibles successfully in the statistical analysis. Of these, the retromolar gap was found to be related to increased mandibular size in modern humans. The status of this trait as a Neanderthal autapomorphy should therefore be treated with caution.

Anatomy, Comparative↗