Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15967708

Stand-off Raman detection using dispersive and tunable filter based systems.

J Chance Carter·Jon Scaffidi·Shana Burnett·Bryan Vasser·Shiv K Sharma·S Michael Angel
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Small, transportable Raman systems are being developed for stand-off Raman measurements at intermediate ranges (e.g. <20 m) for planetary measurements. Four variations of stand-off Raman systems are described that use a small telescope for light collection that is either fiber-optic or lens-coupled to a detection system. The performance of an acousto-optic tunable filter for wavelength selection and spectral imaging is tested by comparing signal-to-noise ratio and throughput to similar measurements using a conventional spectrograph, and by measuring a variety of organic and inorganic mineral samples at distances up to 15 m. We also determine optimal ICCD gate widths for acquiring remote Raman spectra under high ambient light conditions.

Explore related subjects

FiltrationMarsMineralsSpectrum Analysis, RamanComparative StudyJournal ArticleResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Chance Carter, Jon Scaffidi, Shana Burnett, Bryan Vasser, Shiv K Sharma, S Michael Angel. 2005. Stand-off Raman detection using dispersive and tunable filter based systems.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2005.02.028

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Membrane-assisted processing of xylooligosaccharide-containing liquors.

Liquors from rice husk autohydrolyis, containing xylooligosaccharides, other saccharides, and nonsaccharide compounds, were subjected to two selected processing schemes to increase the proportion of substituted xylooligosaccharides in refined liquors. Nanofiltration through a ceramic membrane with a molecular mass cutoff of 1000 Da allowed simultaneous concentration and purification; this latter derived from the preferential removal of monosaccharides and nonsaccharide compounds. When liquors were nanofiltered to achieve a volume reduction factor of 5 operating at a transmembrane pressure of 14 bar, 58.6% of the nonsaccharide components and 20.9-46.9% of monosaccharides were kept in retentate, in comparison with 92% of xylooligosaccharides and glucooligosaccharides. When nanofiltered liquors were subjected to double ion-exchange processing, a final product with a nonsaccharide content near 9 kg/100 kg of nonvolatile components was obtained at a yield of 10.90 kg/100 kg oven dry rice husks. Alternatively, when nanofiltered liquors were subjected to ethyl acetate extraction and further double ion-exchange processing, a purified product with a nonsaccharide content of 5.66 kg/100 kg of nonvolatile components was obtained at a yield of 9.94 kg/100 kg oven dry rice husks. The nonsaccharide components remaining in the final concentrate were mainly made up of phenolic and nitrogen-containing compounds.

Filtration↗
PubMed2006

Removing selenate from groundwater with a vegetable oil-based biobarrier.

Vegetable oil-based permeable reactive biobarriers (PRBs) were evaluated as a method for remediating groundwater containing unacceptable amounts of selenate. PRBs formed by packing laboratory columns with sand coated with soybean oil were used. In an initial 24-week study a simulated groundwater containing 10 mg L(-1) selenate-Se was supplied to three soil columns and the selenate and selenite content of the effluent waters monitored. Two of the soil columns were effective at removing selenate and, during the final 21 weeks of the study, effluents from these columns contained almost no selenate or selenite. Almost all (95%) of the selenate removed was recovered as immobilized selenium sequestered in the solid matrix of the column. For unknown reasons, the third column failed to reduce selenate. A second study looked at the ability of PRBs to remove selenate when nitrate was present. As was done in the first study, three columns were evaluated but this time the water supplied to the columns contained 20 mg L(-1 )nitrate-N and 10 mg L(-1) selenate-Se. Nitrate quickly disappeared from the effluents of these columns and during the final 23 weeks of the study, the nitrate content of the effluent water averaged less than 0.03 microg ml(-1) nitrate-N. Selenate was also removed by these columns but at a slower rate than observed with nitrate. In the final 6 weeks of the study, about 95% of the selenate applied to the columns was removed. In situ PRBs containing soybean oil might be used to remediate groundwater contaminated with both selenate and nitrate.

Filtration↗
PubMed2006

Nonchromatographic "stir and filter approach" (SAFA) for isolating Sc3N@C80 metallofullerenes.

Separation difficulties have led to a paucity of purified metallic nitride fullerenes (MNFs). Fundamental research and application development has been hampered with limited sample availability. Separation techniques designed to remove contaminant empty-cage fullerenes (e.g., C(60), C(70)...C(2)(n)) and classical metallofullerenes (e.g., non-MNFs) traditionally require expensive and tedious chromatographic methods. Our motivation is an alternative purification approach to minimize dependence on HPLC. Herein we report the use of cyclopentadienyl (CPD) and amino functionalized silica to selectively bind contaminant fullerenes. This "Stir and Filter Approach" (SAFA) provides purified MNF samples at ambient and reflux conditions. Under reflux conditions, purified MNFs (80% recovery, 41 h) are obtained using CPD silica. However, at room temperature, there is an equilibrium established between fullerenes and CPD silica, and no purified MNF samples are obtained using SAFA. In contrast, purified MNF samples (99+%) are readily obtained at room temperature using amino, diamino, and triamino silica at recoveries of 93% (11 h), 76% (9 h), and 50% (6 h), respectively.

Filtration↗