Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15938513

Tick-borne viruses.

M Labuda·P A Nuttall
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

At least 38 viral species are transmitted by ticks. Virus-tick-vertebrate host relationships are highly specific and less than 10% of all tick species (Argasidae and Ixodidae) are known to play a role as vectors of arboviruses. However, a few tick species transmit several (e.g. Ixodes ricinus, Amblyomma variegatum) or many (I. uriae) tick-borne viruses. Tick-borne viruses are found in six different virus families (Asfarviridae, Reoviridae, Rhabdoviridae, Orthomyxoviridae, Bunyaviridae, Flaviviridae) and at least 9 genera. Some as yet unassigned tick-borne viruses may belong to a seventh family, the Arenaviridae. With only one exception (African swine fever virus, family Asfarviridae) all tick-borne viruses (as well as all other arboviruses) are RNA viruses. Tick-borne viruses are found in all the RNA virus families in which insect-borne members are found, with the exception of the family Togaviridae. Some tick-borne viruses pose a significant threat to the health of humans (Tick-borne encephalitis virus, Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus) or livestock (African swine fever virus, Nairobi sheep disease virus). Key challenges are to determine the molecular adaptations that allow tick-borne viruses to infect and replicate in both tick and vertebrate cells, and to identify the principal ecological determinants of tick-borne virus survival.

Explore related subjects

African Swine FeverAfrican Swine Fever VirusAnimalsArachnid VectorsArbovirus InfectionsArbovirusesHost-Parasite InteractionsHumansRNA Virus InfectionsRNA VirusesTick-Borne DiseasesTicksJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Labuda, P A Nuttall. 2004. Tick-borne viruses.. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182004005220

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Kinetics of African swine fever virus infection in Ornithodoros erraticus ticks.

The kinetics of African swine fever virus (ASFV) infection in Ornithodoros erraticus ticks were investigated in specimens collected in the field at different times following an outbreak of the disease in Portugal in 1999 and in ticks infected experimentally with a virus isolated from a tick collected during this outbreak. In ticks collected from the field, initial screening for ASFV was carried out by PCR, followed by attempts to isolate the virus in macrophage cultures. Considering total numbers of ticks tested independently of developmental stages, ASFV DNA was detected in 42.3, 26.4 and 22.4% of specimens collected at weeks 0, 32 and 63 following the outbreak, respectively. Although virus was not isolated from most of these ticks, the proportion of isolations from large nymphs and adults increased between weeks 0 and 32 from 2 to 9 % and from 5 to 11.5%, respectively. These results, together with the higher virus titres at week 32, suggest that virus replication occurred. In contrast, virus isolations from small nymphs decreased over this period, from 5 to 1.3%. At week 63, infection rates decreased for all stages. Experimental infections showed the occurrence of virus replication within 4 weeks post-feeding and maintenance of high titres in almost 100% of ticks until 20 weeks post-infection. At weeks 41 and 61, a drop in virus titres and infection rates was observed. Relevant to the understanding of African swine fever epidemiology, our results show that ASFV replicates and persists in O. erraticus, but a viral clearance occurs at later times in both natural and experimental infections.

African Swine Fever↗