PubMed · 15918457
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Jo Trim. Monitoring temperature.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15918457/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Irradiation of the axillary nodes is often indicated in the clinical radiotherapy of patients with lymphoma and breast cancer. The relative location of the axillary nodes and the humeral head has historically been estimated based on lymphangiographic data. Since CT offers more precise definition, the axillary nodal region in relation to the humeral head was systematically studied in 61 patients undergoing CT simulation for breast conservation therapy. Differences in arm position (degree of abduction) significantly affected the location of the axillary nodal region in relation to the humeral head. With the arm abducted beyond 55 degrees, humeral head blocking would result in blocking of some of the axillary nodes.
AIMS: To characterize the various clinicopathologic features in cases of breast cancer with positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs), in order to determine factors that might help in predicting the involvement of the non-SLNs. METHODS: A retrospective database review was performed of 726 breast cancer patients with stage 0-II, in whom SLNs were successfully identified. One hundred eighty-five of these patients showed positive SLNs, and subsequently underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). These cases were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of metastases in the non-SLNs, i.e. positive non-SLNs (NSLN+; 81 cases) and negative non-SLNs (NSLN-; 104 cases). RESULTS: Multivariate analysis revealed that a larger size of the primary tumour (>2.0cm), presence of lymphatic invasion, larger size of the largest SLN metastasis (>2mm), and a 100% metastatic rate in the SLNs (number of positive SLNs/number of harvested SLNs) were significantly associated with NSLN+. Among the cases in which all the four factors were present, 73% (30/41) were found to have NSLN+. CONCLUSION: We found four independent predictors in relation to non-SLN metastasis. Although these factors might be useful for determining the need of additional ALND, it would seem that even the presence of all of these four factors in combination may be insufficient to safely omit ALND. Thus, until further evidence is accumulated from the results of large clinical trials, ALND would still be recommended for patients with SLN metastasis.