Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 15912879

Recognizing faces defined by texture gradients.

Abstract

Texture gradients can reveal surface orientation in a manner similar to shape from shading, and therefore provide an important cue for object recognition. In this study, we tested whether a complex 3-D object, such as a face, can be identified from texture gradients alone. The stimuli were laser-scanned faces for which the texture element was a fractal-noise pattern mapped onto the 3-D surface. An eight-alternative forced choice task was used in which participants matched a face defined by texture gradients to one of eight faces defined by shape from shading (Experiment 1) or by texture gradients (Experiment 2). On average, participants scored 24% and 18%, respectively, above chance in these experiments. Although this performance was much poorer than the performance based entirely on shape-from-shading stimuli (Experiment 3), the results suggest that texture gradient information may be used to recover surface geometry of complex objects.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Chang Hong Liu, Charles A Collin, Reza Farivar, Avi Chaudhuri. 2005. Recognizing faces defined by texture gradients.. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03195019

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Gradient representation and perception in the early visual system--a novel account of Mach band formation.

Recent evidence suggests that object surfaces and their properties are represented at early stages in the visual system of primates. Most likely invariant surface properties are extracted to endow primates with robust object recognition capabilities. In real-world scenes, luminance gradients are often superimposed on surfaces. We argue that gradients should also be represented in the visual system, since they encode highly variable information, such as shading, focal blur, and penumbral blur. We present a neuronal architecture which was designed and optimized for segregating and representing luminance gradients in real-world images. Our architecture in addition provides a novel theory for Mach bands, whereby corresponding psychophysical data are predicted consistently.

Contrast Sensitivity↗

Evidence for elongated receptive field structure for mechanisms subserving stereopsis.

To study the spatial extent and shape of the binocular disparity mechanisms subserving depth perception, we employ the spatial summation paradigm of contrast threshold for front/back depth discrimination at a fixed binocular disparity. The stimuli were Gabor patches with disparity set at either 4 or 8 arcmin and spatial frequency set at an optimal value of 4 cy/deg. Contrast threshold was measured as a function of length and width of the Gabor patches to determine the aspect ratio of greatest efficiency. The space constant of the Gaussian envelope varied between 0.0375 degrees and 0.9 degrees in either vertical or horizontal directions, or both simultaneously. For vertical elongation of the Gabor patches, discrimination sensitivity improved by 4-6 dB for a doubling of the length of the Gabor patches, then reduced more slowly as the length further increased. However, extending the Gabor patches horizontally across cycles produced little or no sensitivity improvement. Instead, discrimination performance collapsed in a fashion that is incompatible with many models of disparity processing. The results imply that the main mechanisms subserving stereoscopic depth discrimination are vertically elongated for vertical-bar Gabors and encounter special difficulties integrating horizontal disparity information. Disparity discrimination sensitivity for very small targets was also much greater than predicted by the single-mechanism fit, implying the presence of a second, independent mechanism with a very small summation field, which may underlie the fine stereoscopic processing system.

Contrast Sensitivity↗

Second-order spatial frequency and orientation channels in human vision.

We compared the number of spatial frequency and orientation mechanisms underlying first- versus second-order processing by measuring discrimination at detection threshold for first- and second-order Gabors to determine the smallest difference in spatial frequency and orientation that permits accurate discrimination at threshold. For second-order gratings, the number of channels is the same as for first-order gratings for spatial frequencies up to about 2 cpd; however, there are fewer second-order channels at higher spatial frequencies. In contrast, the number of labeled channels for orientation is the same for first- and second-order gratings. In conclusion, our findings provide evidence for distinct spatial frequency and orientation labeled detectors in second-order visual processing. We also show that, relative to first-order, there are fewer second-order channels processing higher spatial frequencies. This is consistent with a filter-rectify-filter scheme for second-order in which the second stage of filtering is at lower spatial frequencies.

Contrast Sensitivity↗