[Traumatic perinatal cervical dislocation].

S Haddad-Zebouni; D Elia; N Aoun; M Ghossain

doi:10.1016/j.arcped.2005.01.028

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15885546

[Traumatic perinatal cervical dislocation].

S Haddad-Zebouni·D Elia·N Aoun·M Ghossain

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We report on a case of cervical dislocation in which the severity of the lesion contrasts with the paucity of the symptoms. An eight-month-old girl presented with weakness of the left upper limb. She had a normal cephalic delivery. On the following days, increased weakness of the limb showed a spontaneous, partial regression. Clinical examination at eight months showed a normal physical and psychical development, a falling neck and an impossibility to maintain the sitting position, but a normal mobility of the lower limbs. Cervical radiography performed showed a complete dislocation. CT confirmed the diagnosis and eliminated congenital vertebral anomalies. Magnetic resonance imaging showed an important stretching and compression of the spinal cord. Cervical spine damage in the newborn are scarce and serious. The here reported case is characterized by a complete vertebral dislocation associated with medullar stretching and compression, but few initial symptoms.

Explore related subjects

Cervical Vertebrae Female Humans Infant Joint Dislocations Case Reports Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

S Haddad-Zebouni, D Elia, N Aoun, M Ghossain. 2005. [Traumatic perinatal cervical dislocation].. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcped.2005.01.028

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Contrast flow characteristics in the cervical epidural space: an analysis of cervical epidurograms.

STUDY DESIGN: A single-center prospective analysis of cervical epidurograms, using a crossover design. OBJECTIVES: To delineate the extent and pattern of spread of epidural contrast during cervical epidural steroid injections. To determine the volume of solution needed for effective cervical epidural steroid injections. To determine the most appropriate neck flexion angles for cervical epidural steroid injections. To determine the relationships between epidural spread, degree of neck flexion, and volume of solution used during cervical epidural steroid injections. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The decreased epidural space in the cervical region makes injections here liable to rare, but potentially serious, complications. The lower cervical (C6-C7, C7-T1) levels are thought to be safer because of the increased epidural space here, as compared with higher levels. There is, however, considerable controversy in the scientific literature regarding the levels at which cervical epidural injections should be performed. There is also no consensus regarding the volume of solution needed or the extent of neck flexion required for effective epidural spread. To date, no study has examined these questions. METHODS: Patients with lower cervical spine pathology who were referred for cervical epidural steroid injections were randomly assigned to have the injections performed at the C6-C7 or C7-T1 midline level. Volume of solutions used and degree of neck flexion were measured. Characteristics of epidural spread were recorded. Patients requiring repeat injections had the injections performed at the adjacent level with identical volume and angle of neck flexion using a goniometer. Contrast flow characteristics were again recorded. Extent of spread was correlated with the level of injection, volume of injectant, and degree of neck flexion. RESULTS: No major or permanent complications were noted. The contrast was found to spread evenly throughout the entire dorsal cervical epidural space, on a consistent basis, in all cases. At C6-C7, it was found to spread an average of 3.61 +/- 0.84 levels; and at C7-T1, it spread an average of 3.88 +/- 1.01 levels. Using a three-way analysis of variance, the level at which the epidural was performed, the amount of contrast used, and the neck flexion angle did not affect the number of levels spread. CONCLUSIONS: In cervical epidural steroid injections performed in the midline at C6-C7 and C7-T1, the contrast consistently covers the dorsal cervical epidural space bilaterally, irrespective of the volume used or neck flexion angle used. This suggests that solutions introduced here would cover the dorsal cervical epidural space. This questions the utility of performing potentially more dangerous injections at higher cervical levels or more invasive procedures, such as the use of epidural catheters.

Cervical Vertebrae↗

PubMed2006

Classification of lower cervical spine injuries.

STUDY DESIGN: Blinded assessment by multiple observers of consecutive case series. OBJECTIVES: Measure the reliability of a new system of determining stability in subaxial cervical spine injuries. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Classification is fundamental to allow communication, determine prognosis, and direct treatment. Current systems have many limitations, including difficultly of use, lack of proven reliability and validity, and no assessment of stability. A new system to assess instability is proposed. METHODS: A literature review of the most commonly described classification systems is reported. The Cervical Spine Injury Severity Score was tested for reliability by 10 examiners who graded 35 consecutive cases of cervical trauma. Plain radiographs and CT were saved as read using Efilm Lite in random order. Each was scored and intraobserver and interobserver agreement was measured using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: Intraobserver agreement was excellent with ICC ranging from 0.97 to 0.99. Interobserver agreement was also excellent with mean 0.80 ranging from 0.75 to 0.98. CONCLUSION: A new cervical spine classification system of injury is paramount to treatment and outcomes. A new system may increase reliability and therefore allow more accurate determination of stability and dictate treatment.

Cervical Vertebrae↗

PubMed2006

The evolution of spinal instrumentation for the management of occipital cervical and cervicothoracic junctional injuries.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Independent computer-based literature review of articles pertaining to instrumentation and fusion of junctional injuries of the cervical spine. OBJECTIVE: To review and discuss the evolution of instrumentation techniques and systems used in the treatment of cervical spine junctional injuries. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Instrumentation of junctional injuries of the cervical spine has been limited historically by failure to achieve rigid internal fixation in multiple planes. The evolution of these techniques has required increased insight into the morphology and unique biomechanics of the structures to be instrumented. METHODS: Computer-based literature search of Ovid and PubMed databases. RESULTS: Extensive literature search yielded insights into the evolution of systems initially based on onlay bone graft combined with wiring techniques. Such techniques have come to include systems incorporating rigid, longitudinal struts that accommodate multiplanar screws placed in the lateral masses, pedicles, transarticular regions, and occipital bone. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a rapid evolution of techniques and instrumentation technologies, it remains incumbent on the physician to provide the patient with a surgical procedure that balances the likelihood of a favorable outcome with the risk inherent in the implementation of the procedure.

Cervical Vertebrae↗