PubMed · 15879945
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Margaret McGill. 2005. What causes postmenopausal bleeding?. https://doi.org/10.1097/00152193-200505000-00020
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: Ureteral lesions can be difficult to diagnose. The value of ureteral biopsy in addition to ureteral washings has not been defined clearly. METHODS: All ureteral washings and biopsies with follow-up that were performed at a single institution were reviewed. RESULTS: In total, 39 patients underwent ureteral washing, ureteral biopsy, or both and had follow-up: Eighteen patients had urothelial tumors at follow-up (14 high-grade carcinomas, 3 low-grade carcinomas, and 1 papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential). The sensitivity was 79% for washings and 71% for biopsies (P = 1.0), for a combined sensitivity of 100%. Biopsies often were scant, and cell blocks from biopsies and washings often were of value. CONCLUSIONS: Ureteral washings and biopsies had similar sensitivity and appeared to be complementary. Cell blocks often are useful for both specimen types.
Central diabetes insipidus (CDI) is a rare disorder that may be caused by a variety of diseases. In pediatric and adolescent patients the most common causes for CDI are Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) and germinoma. To avoid a potentially hazardous biopsy of the hypothalamic pituitary region it is recommended to evaluate patients with CDI carefully to identify potential extracranial lesions. Since LCH is the most common systemic disease that may cause CDI, special focus is paid to the identification of LCH lesions. We report on a 9(1/2) year old girl who presented with central diabetes insipidus and a thickening of the pituitary stalk on magnetic resonance imaging. Diagnostic workup revealed a history of recurrent ear infections and a compressed 6th thoracic vertebral body on radiographs. Based on these findings LCH was anticipated. Upon growth of the pituitary stalk lesion the patient was treated with LCH standard chemotherapy. After an initial shrinkage of the lesion, a further growth of the pituitary stalk lesion was observed and the tumor was resected. Histopathology revealed germinoma. This case underscores the importance of a istopathologically proven diagnosis in patients with HPR tumors before the initiation of a specific therapy, even if the clinical findings are highly suggestive.
New lesions that occur while patients are receiving treatment for malignant tumors may represent not only difficulties in arriving at the correct diagnosis, but also impact on subsequent therapeutic options. We encountered a patient developing new pulmonary lesions during and after receiving treatment for Stage II Wilms tumor (WT). The presence of mature rhabdomyoblasts in multiple biopsy specimens allowed rational decisions to be made regarding subsequent therapy. This and other published experiences suggest that patients with WT may develop choristomas or have tumors, which undergo cytodifferentiation. Methodologies are now available allowing differentiation of these two processes.