Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 1584620

Inter-observer variability in a computer-assisted optic nerve head assessment system.

M J Cox·I C Wood
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A computer-assisted optic nerve head analysis system was used to measure parameters of the optic nerve head from one eye from each of 15 subjects. The subjects comprised three groups of five, being glaucomatous, ocular hypertensive, and normal. The 15 images produced were analysed in a randomized masked fashion by ten observers of varying levels of experience to test the inter-observer variability of the measurements. An analysis of variance demonstrated significant differences in the measurements made by the different observers. Fisher's F-test showed that all the parameters assessing the pallor area of the optic nerve head had significantly lower inter-image variance (reported previously) compared with inter-observer variance (at the 5% level). Variability in taking measurements of the pallor area of the optic nerve head is mainly due to observer variations rather than the image variations.

Explore related subjects

GlaucomaHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedObserver VariationOcular HypertensionOptic DiskClinical TrialComparative StudyJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M J Cox, I C Wood. 1992. Inter-observer variability in a computer-assisted optic nerve head assessment system.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1584620/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Do scleral flap dimensions influence reliability of intraocular pressure control in experimental trabeculectomy?

AIM: To compare the effect on intraocular pressure (IOP) of large vs small scleral flap size during trabeculectomy using adjustable sutures. METHODS: Trabeculectomy operations were performed on nine donor human eyes connected to a constant flow infusion with real-time IOP monitoring. Large scleral flaps (4 x 4 mm, 16 mm(2), n=12) or small scleral flaps (3 x 2 mm, 6 mm(2), n=9) were constructed over 0.76 mm(2) sclerostomies. For each procedure, equilibrium IOP was measured following tight closure with two four-throw adjustable 10-0 nylon sutures. RESULTS: Five scleral flaps were thin or poorly constructed; four of these were in the initial seven procedures, implying learning effect. These had a mean absolute IOP of 7.6 mmHg (range 2.7-12.4 mmHg) and mean relative IOP of 28.3% of baseline (range 10-45.8%) after closure. In the remaining 16 good quality procedures, mean IOP was 1.3 mmHg (range 0-3.4 mmHg) after sclerostomy, confirming minimal outflow resistance before closure. Following flap closure mean IOP was 20 mmHg (SD 4.4, range 15.5-29.3 mmHg) for large (n=8), and 18.7 mmHg (SD 3.6, 15.9-25.8 mmHg) for small (n=8) flaps (unpaired t-test, P=0.26). Mean IOP (% baseline) was 71.6% (SD 8.4, range 60.6-86.6%) and 66% (SD=12.7, 46.8-86.6%) for large and small flap groups, respectively (unpaired t-test, P=0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Well-constructed scleral flaps of both sizes were able to support an average IOP at least two-thirds of baseline, and both had similar absolute IOP levels. Errors in flap construction resulted in loss of IOP control. Smaller flap size does not appear to compromise control of early postoperative IOP using adjustable sutures.

Glaucoma↗