PubMed · 15793948
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Janis Smy. Hearing aid.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15793948/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Costs of providing psychosocial rehabilitation services are analyzed using data from clubhouse programs in 12 countries. We explored effects of several program operating characteristics on total program cost per year, cost per member per year, and cost per visit. We also examined the relationship between program costs and the range of services offered. Clubhouse costs were found to be a function of the country in which the program was located, program age, and certification status. The number of specific services offered was not related to cost. Findings provide a more complete understanding of the operations and expenses of clubhouses.
In the post-deinstitutionalization era, supported housing has emerged as a housing and service approach considered most conducive to the goal of consumer empowerment and community integration. Although prior research found beneficial effects of supported housing, little empirical work has been done on identifying the gaps between the principles and practice of supported housing. Using multiple data sources on 27 supported independent living (SIL) programs for psychiatric consumers in a large metropolitan community, this paper examines the extent to which these programs are implemented in accordance with supported housing. Findings suggest consistency with as well as deviation from the supported housing approach in regard to consumer choice, typical and normalized housing, resource accessibility, consumer control and provision of individualized and flexible support. This study suggests methods for assessing housing programs for psychiatric consumers along these domains. Implications for the development of housing programs that promote consumer empowerment and community integration are discussed.
The US Institute of Medicine's (IOM) influential 2003 report has focused attention on disparities in treatment outcomes and health status for American minorities, zeroing in on the role of unconscious bias in the unequal clinical disposition of minority patients. In keeping with the IOM's focus, current examinations of health disparities in the US tend to explore bias in clinical decision-making to the neglect of the political economic trends that buffet health care safety net sites and create the need for financial shortcuts. This paper recontextualizes the study of health disparities in the US by placing it against the backdrop of private sector trends emphasizing fiscal austerity and increased workforce productivity in health care. The social science literature on workers in human service bureaucracies, only recently applied to health care workers, suggests that higher demands for system "accountability" and worker "efficiency" may encourage providers to take shortcuts by treating individuals as mass categories. This ethnography of a Latino mental health clinic in the Northwestern USA shows that new private-sector measures of "productivity" take a toll on both the Latina clinicians whose invisible work subsidizes the system as well as on particular categories of patients--the uninsured and immigrants with serious psychosocial issues. While clinicians attempt to buffer the impacts of such reforms on patients, they also resort to means to increase their productivity such as firing repeated no-show patients and denial of care to the uninsured. This study is relevant for the health care of the poor in all health care systems considering restructuring along managerial principles to increase system 'efficiencies.'