Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 1578629

[A computerized anesthesia record system: four years' experience].

Abstract

A computerized anesthesia record system is in routine use for cardiovascular procedures in our operating rooms. This system is implemented on an NEC PC-9801 personal computer and automatically collects hemodynamic variables from a polygraph as well as from intraoperative laboratory reports via RS-232C ports. Events such as intubation can be entered manually using a standard keyboard. Since the introduction of the system in 1987, the system has been used in 90 percent of the total cases performed and 2941 electronic data files were recorded in a four-year period. Excluding some short procedures for which the system was not used, failure to store records on disks resulted from system errors due to power-line troubles in the operating rooms as well as users' omission to command the system. User-acceptance of event entry was poor. In 74 percent of the cases, not a single event was entered. Advantage of an automated anesthesia record system over a hand-written record is being recognized. Wide-spread use of such a system will require ergonomic design of the system and man-machine interfaces suitable for use in an operating room.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

O Uchida, F Okumura, H Ohsumi, O Takaki, M Kuro. 1992. [A computerized anesthesia record system: four years' experience].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1578629/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Perception of training needs and opportunities in advanced airway skills: a survey of British and Irish trainees.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We surveyed delegates at the Group of Anaesthetists in Training (UK) meeting to investigate evidence of a training-gap (number of fibreoptic intubations believed to bestow competence vs. number actually performed). METHODS: Questionnaires were distributed to and collected from delegates in person. Questions covered six areas, including experience of fibreoptic intubation and cricothyrotomy, fibreoptic intubation as a specialist skill and ethical issues. RESULTS: We received 221 replies (76%). All trainees believed competence to be achievable with 10 intubations (interquartile range (IQR) 10-20); the median number performed was 2 (IQR 0-4). This was statistically significant for the groups' senior house officers, 1st and 2nd year registrars and 3rd and 4th year registrars; P < 0.0001. Many final year trainees (12/20, 60%) also failed to achieve their competency target. Few trainees had seen or performed any cricothyrotomies (medians 0, IQRs 0-1 and 0-0). Most (195/208, 94%) believed that fibreoptic intubation was a core skill and 199/212 (94%) believed that all should be competent by completion of training. Ten percent (n = 208) felt it unethical to perform an awake training intubation with full consent and 10% believed it acceptable without explanation. Most (82.7%) would fibreoptically intubate an asleep patient (requiring intubation) without consent. CONCLUSION: Trainees reported a gap between their perception of competence and achievement in awake fibreoptic intubation. Simple and complex simulations and structured training programmes may help. Anaesthetists must address the ethics of clinical training in advanced airway management.

Anesthesiology↗