Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 1576982

Ovulation detection.

K S Moghissi
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Despite major achievements in elucidating many details of the physiologic processes of human reproduction during the past 2 decades, a simple, reliable, and inexpensive method for the prediction and detection of the time of ovulation is still not available. For clinical purposes, studies of BBT and biophysical and biochemical constituents of cervical mucus appear to be the most practical methods of ovulation detection. The development of rapid and easy-to-use urinary LH assays and steroid assay kits for measurement of urinary and salivary estrogen and progesterone or their metabolites may further improve the precision of ovulation timing.

Explore related subjects

BiopsyBody TemperatureCervix MucusEndometriumEstrogensFemaleFollicle Stimulating HormoneHumansLuteinizing HormoneOvaryOvulationOvulation DetectionProgesteroneSalivaUltrasonographyJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K S Moghissi. 1992. Ovulation detection.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1576982/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

BACKGROUND: In fair-skinned Caucasian populations both the incidence and mortality rates of cutaneous melanoma have been increasing over the past decades. With adjuvant therapies still being under investigation, early detection is the only way to improve melanoma patient survival. The influence of incisional biopsies on melanoma patient survival has been discussed for many years. This study investigates both the influence of diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of residual tumor cells in the re-excision specimen on disease free and overall survival. METHODS: After (partial) removal of a pigmented skin lesion 471 patients were diagnosed with stage I/II melanoma and underwent re-excision and a sentinel node biopsy. All patients were followed prospectively, mean follow up >5 years. Patients were divided according to their diagnostic biopsy type (wide excision biopsy, narrow excision biopsy, excision biopsy with positive margins and incisional biopsy) and the presence of residual tumor cells in their re-excision specimen. Survival analysis was done using Cox's proportional hazard model adjusted for eight important confounders of melanoma patient survival. RESULTS: The diagnostic biopsy was wide in 279 patients, narrow in 109 patients, 52 patients underwent an excision biopsy with positive margins and 31 patients an incisional biopsy. In 41 patients residual tumor cells were present in the re-excision specimen. Both the diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of tumor cells in the re-excision specimen did not influence disease free and overall survival of melanoma patients. CONCLUSIONS: Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

Biopsy↗