Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 1576033

Hyperglycemic emergencies.

Abstract

Hyperglycemic emergencies are the most common endocrinopathies that require intensive care. It is estimated that between 10% and 15% of patients admitted to intensive care units experience complications of acute hyperglycemia. The common denominator of hyperglycemic emergencies is diabetes mellitus, a group of diseases in which, either because of beta-cell destruction of the pancreas or insulin receptor-site defects, there is a relative or absolute deficiency of insulin that results in hyperglycemia. In response to various precipitating factors, staggering hyperglycemia may develop in the form of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) or hyperglycemic hyperosmolar nonketotic syndrome (HHNK). The existence of DKA has been known since ancient times, and critical care nurses are familiar with the diagnosis. The more lethal disorder of HHNK was "rediscovered" in the 1950s and is occurring with greater frequency as clinical awareness of the condition grows and the elderly (who are at greatest risk for the disorder) populate critical care units in increasing numbers. Prevention is instrumental in abating deadly hyperglycemic emergencies. A positive outcome can be realized but only with timely diagnosis and prompt hormonal and fluid replacement.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D O Sauve, C A Kessler. 1992. Hyperglycemic emergencies.. https://doi.org/10.4037/15597768-1992-2007

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Cardiac function in fetuses of poorly-controlled pre-gestational diabetic pregnancies--a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: Cardiac impairment is frequently found in babies of diabetic mothers. It is still controversial whether this is due to poor glucose control. The aim of this study is to compare the cardiac function in fetuses of well- and poorly-controlled pre-gestational diabetic pregnancy in third trimester. METHODS: Women with type 1 pre-gestational diabetes were enrolled at 30-32 weeks. Cardiac size and interventricular septal wall thickness were measured by M-mode at end-diastolic phase. The right and left ventricular ejection fractions were calculated. At the mitral and tricuspid valves inflow, the ratio between early ventricular filling and active atrial filling (E/A) at both atrioventricular valves were measured by Doppler echocardiography. Peak velocities of ascending aorta and pulmonary artery were assessed. The angle of isonation was kept at <20 degrees. Women with poorly-controlled diabetes (HbA1c>6.5%) were compared with those with satisfactorily controlled diabetes (HbA1c < or = 6.5%). RESULTS: A total of 21 women with pre-gestational diabetes were recruited for this study. Eight women with well-controlled diabetes were compared with 9 women who had poorly-controlled diabetes. HbA1c in the poorly-controlled group was 7.3% and in the well-controlled group it was 5.4% (p<0.001). There was no difference between the two groups in cardiac size, interventricular septal wall thickness, ejection fraction, aorta and pulmonary artery peak flow velocities. The right atrioventricular E/A ratio was significantly lower among the poorly-controlled diabetic pregnancies (0.71 vs. 0.54; p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Fetuses of poorly-controlled diabetic mothers had a lower right atrioventricular E/A ratio. This may be due to metabolic acidosis, non-hypertrophic cardiac dysfunction or fetal polycythemia.

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1↗

Pancreatic islet transplantation: the radiographic approach.

BACKGROUND: Successful pancreatic islet transplantation (PIT) has resulted in several transplant centers wanting to start PIT programs. PIT remains experimental and must be performed safely for its continued use. We describe the radiographic techniques used at our center and their results. METHODS: Between January 17, 2002, and December 16, 2002, 17 percutaneous transhepatic PITs were performed by two interventional radiologists. Ultrasound localization of and guidance to the portal vein (PV) were used. Portosplenography confirmed the position of the PV islet infusion catheter, and PV pressure was documented before, during, and at the completion of PIT. To prevent PV thrombosis, heparin (17.5 U/kg) through the PV infusion catheter and subcutaneous enoxaparin (Lovenox, Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Parsippany, NJ) were administered after PIT. At the completion of PIT, thrombin-saturated Gelfoam (Johnson and Johnson, Summerville, NJ) was embolized into the hepatic parenchymal tract. RESULTS: Percutaneous PV access was achieved in all cases (median number of seeker needle passes=2, range: 1-6), and PIT was performed. In no case was any extrahepatic organ punctured, and sustained PV hypertension was not seen. No patient required transfusion, and it was documented by Doppler ultrasonography that PV thrombosis did not result from PIT. In addition, intraparenchymal and intraabdominal bleeding did not complicate any PIT; 71% and 59% of the patients experienced moderate posttransplant abdominal pain and nausea, respectively. All patients demonstrated a self-limited, asymptomatic posttransplant transaminitis. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that PIT should be performed by a small number of experienced interventional radiologists using ultrasound guidance and posttransplant embolization of the hepatic parenchymal tract.

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1↗