PubMed · 15752454
Comparing aberration detection methods with simulated data.
Abstract
We compared aberration detection methods requiring historical data to those that require little background by using simulated data. Methods that require less historical data are as sensitive and specific as those that require 3-5 years of data. These simulations can determine which method produces appropriate sensitivity and specificity.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Lori Hutwagner, Timothy Browne, G Matthew Seeman, Aaron T Fleischauer. 2005. Comparing aberration detection methods with simulated data.. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1102.040587
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.