Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 15719287

[Patient autonomy].

Abstract

Respecting the patient's autonomy is one of the fundamental principles on which biomedical ethics is based. The principle of autonomy considers the patient's freedom and responsibility, who decides what is good for himself/herself, although this is not shared by the physician. In the field of medical research, there are codes and guidelines that guarantee the protection of persons as research subjects. In Spain, recognition of the right of the patient's autonomy has been included in different legal and deontological guidelines. Law of Patient's Autonomy 41/2002 (LAP) is a response to the growing important in our society of the patients' rights as basic axis of the clinical-health care relationships. Different regional communities have also enacted legal guidelines that regulate the persons' autonomy to decide about that affecting his/her health, physical integrity, or life as well as the assumption by others of the decisions of representation or previous instructions. The basic paradigm of autonomy is the informed consent. The LAP establishes the obligation of obtaining the free and voluntary consent of the patient prior to any type of intervention, after offering him/her the adequate information. This basic guideline specifies the situations in which the informed consent is given in writing as well as the exceptions to this consent. Finally, the LAP details when the informed consent is advisable by representation, closely linked to the patient's capacity as well as the regulation of previous instructions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Ortega Moreno. 2004. [Patient autonomy].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15719287/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[A separation of public health ethics from medical ethics].

Until now there are only a few approaches in the German-speaking realm to establish an explicit ethical framework for moral issues of public health--although a need for public health ethics in times of SARS and avian flu is obvious. One deficit of the discussion so far is that there is no systematic separation of medical ethics and public health ethics. Thus, the core and interdisciplinary focus of public health is often not met. However, to frame discussions of moral issues within a specific public health ethics framework seems to be fruitful. This paper deals with the conceptual differences of medical ethics and public health ethics. The discussion helps both applied ethical discourses to sharpen their focus and strengthen their appeal. The author develops and presents a conceptual and normative frame for public health ethics and offers a concise set of ethical principles for the discussion of moral challenges in public health.

Ethics, Medical↗