Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 15718740

Collaborative biomedical data exploration in distributed virtual environments.

Abstract

Imaging techniques such as MRI, fMRI, CT and PET have provided doctors with a means to acquire high-resolution biomedical images that serve as the foundation for the diagnosis and treatment of diseases. Experts with a multitude of backgrounds, including radiologists, anatomists, psychiatrists and neuroscientists now collaboratively analyze the same images to extract a better understanding of the encoded information. Unfortunately, access to these specialists at the same physical location is not always possible and new tools and techniques are required to facilitate simultaneous and collaborative exploration of volumetric data between spatially separated domain experts. This paper presents CVMED, a collaborative visualization environment for volumetric biomedical data-sets, supporting heterogeneous hardware, rendering and display systems connected via heterogeneous networks. CVMED provides the user with the algorithms and tools for stereoscopic as well as monoscopic data visualization and annotation along with the middleware needed to exchange the resulting visuals between all participants in real-time.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Falko Kuester, Zhiyu He, Jason Kimball, Marc Antonijuan Tresens, Melvin Quintos. 2005. Collaborative biomedical data exploration in distributed virtual environments.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15718740/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Context awareness in health care: a review.

BACKGROUND: Health care systems will integrate new computing paradigms in the coming years. Context-awareness computing is a research field which often refers to health care as an interesting and rich area of application. AIM: Through a survey of the research literature, we intended to derive an objective view of the actual dynamism of context awareness in health care, and to identify strengths and weaknesses in this field. METHODS: After discussing definitions of context, we proposed a simple framework to analyse and characterize the use of context through three main axes. We then focused on context-awareness computing and reported on the main teams working in this area. We described some of the context-awareness projects in health care. A deeper analysis of the hospital-based projects demonstrated the gap between recommendations expressed for modelling context awareness and the actual use in a prototype. Finally, we identified pitfalls encountered in this area of research. RESULTS: A number of opportunities remain for this evolving field of research. We found relatively few groups with such a specific focus. As yet there is no consensus as to the most appropriate models or attributes to include in context awareness. We conclude that a greater understanding of which aspects of context are important in a health care setting is required; the inherent sociotechnical nature of context-aware applications in health care; and the need to draw on a number of disciplines to conduct this research.

Biomedical Technology↗

Making sense of medical technology.

In seeking to explain contradictory reports that increased medical spending is both valuable and wasteful, Jonathan Skinner and colleagues rightly emphasize differences in regional practice patterns in response to constraints. However, it is more accurate to view the situation not as a choice between valuable but inexpensive care and more costly care with worse outcomes-as Skinner and colleagues theorize-but as a choice between responses to regional inefficiencies. Given that we do not know what will best improve the efficiency of medical care in a given area, experiments with financial incentives to both providers and individual patients should receive high priority.

Biomedical Technology↗