Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15713289

Muscle forces predicted using optimization methods are coordinate system dependent.

Janine E Pierce·Guoan Li
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Optimization methods are widely used to predict in vivo muscle forces in musculoskeletal joints. Moment equilibrium at the joint center (usually chosen as the origin of the joint coordinate system) has been used as a constraint condition for optimization procedures and the joint reaction moments were assumed zero. This study, through the use of a three-dimensional elbow model, investigated the effect of coordinate system origin (joint center) location on muscle forces predicted using a nonlinear static optimization method. The results demonstrated that moving the origin of the coordinate system medially and laterally along the flexion-extension axis caused dramatic variations in the predicted muscle forces. For example, moving the origin of the coordinate system from a position 5mm medial to 5mm lateral of the geometric elbow center caused the predicted biceps force to vary from 12% to 46% and the brachialis force to vary from 80% to 34% of the total muscle loading. The joint reaction force reduced by 24% with this medial to lateral variation of the coordinate system origin location. This data revealed that the muscle forces predicted using the optimization method are sensitive to the coordinate system origin location due to the zero joint reaction moment assumption in the moment constraint condition. For accurate prediction of muscle load distributions using optimization methods, it is necessary to determine the accurate coordinate system origin location where the condition of a zero joint reaction moment is satisfied.

Explore related subjects

Biomechanical PhenomenaElbowHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalJointsMethodsModels, TheoreticalMovementMuscle, SkeletalJournal ArticleResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Janine E Pierce, Guoan Li. 2005. Muscle forces predicted using optimization methods are coordinate system dependent.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.016

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

A pinch elastometer for soft tissue.

A prototype compression elastometer suited to the characterisation of soft tissue is analysed and tested by application to various elastomers. The test material is pinched between two rigid cylinders and the compression force and displacement interpreted to yield a measure of "effective" stiffness or to calibrate a simple non-linear-elastic material model (Neo-Hookean). This deformation suits the testing of bulk soft tissue since it effectively isolates the test material from boundary conditions such as other soft tissue, ligaments and bones. These can be highly variable in the body and can affect results greatly when employing other types of tests to determine the elastic nature of tissue. A simple linear-material analysis, based on established solutions to two-dimensional problems, is extended to take into account various geometrical complexities. This analysis permits immediate inversion of the readings from the device to yield the elastic properties of the material, without the need for complex numerical analysis. Finite element analysis is also employed to determine the range of reliable application of the linear-elastic model. In particular, this analysis permits the extension of the linear-elastic analysis to include simple forms of non-linear-material behaviour. The method is demonstrated using three elastomers having significantly different material properties. A viable range of application of the device is identified in which it yields results with reasonable precision and accuracy. The prototype device was able to measure the effective elastic modulus of the test materials with a maximum error of 13% for three material types (N=25). Repeatability error was less than 7% in all cases. Further refinement of the device and measuring system will reduce this uncertainty.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗
PubMed2006

Brittle stalk 2 encodes a putative glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored protein that affects mechanical strength of maize tissues by altering the composition and structure of secondary cell walls.

A spontaneous maize mutant, brittle stalk-2 (bk2-ref), exhibits dramatically reduced tissue mechanical strength. Reduction in mechanical strength in the stalk tissue was highly correlated with a reduction in the amount of cellulose and an uneven deposition of secondary cell wall material in the subepidermal and perivascular sclerenchyma fibers. Cell wall accounted for two-thirds of the observed reduction in dry matter content per unit length of the mutant stalk in comparison to the wildtype stalk. Although the cell wall composition was significantly altered in the mutant in comparison to the wildtype stalks, no compensation by lignin and cell wall matrix for reduced cellulose amount was observed. We demonstrate that Bk2 encodes a Cobra-like protein that is homologous to the rice Bc1 protein. In the bk2-ref gene, a 1 kb transposon-like element is inserted in the beginning of the second exon, disrupting the open reading frame. The Bk2 gene was expressed in the stalk, husk, root, and leaf tissues, but not in the embryo, endosperm, pollen, silk, or other tissues with comparatively few or no secondary cell wall containing cells. The highest expression was in the isolated vascular bundles. In agreement with its role in secondary wall formation, the expression pattern of the Bk2 gene was very similar to that of the ZmCesA10, ZmCesA11, and ZmCesA12 genes, which are known to be involved in secondary wall formation. We have isolated an independent Mutator-tagged allele of bk2, referred to as bk2-Mu7, the phenotype of which is similar to that of the spontaneous mutant. Our results demonstrate that mutations in the Bk2 gene affect stalk strength in maize by interfering with the deposition of cellulose in the secondary cell wall in fiber cells.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗
PubMed2006

Association between sitting and occupational LBP.

Low back pain (LBP) has been identified as one of the most costly disorders among the worldwide working population. Sitting has been associated with risk of developing LBP. The purpose of this literature review is to assemble and describe evidence of research on the association between sitting and the presence of LBP. The systematic literature review was restricted to those occupations that require sitting for more than half of working time and where workers have physical co-exposure factors such as whole body vibration (WBV) and/or awkward postures. Twenty-five studies were carefully selected and critically reviewed, and a model was developed to describe the relationships between these factors. Sitting alone was not associated with the risk of developing LBP. However, when the co-exposure factors of WBV and awkward postures were added to the analysis, the risk of LBP increased fourfold. The occupational group that showed the strongest association with LBP was Helicopter Pilots (OR=9.0, 90% CI 4.9-16.4). For all studied occupations, the odds ratio (OR) increased when WBV and/or awkward postures were analyzed as co-exposure factors. WBV while sitting was also independently associated with non-specific LBP and sciatica. Vibration dose, as well as vibration magnitude and duration of exposure, were associated with LBP in all occupations. Exposure duration was associated with LBP to a greater extent than vibration magnitude. However, for the presence of sciatica, this difference was not found. Awkward posture was also independently associated with the presence of LBP and/or sciatica. The risk effect of prolonged sitting increased significantly when the factors of WBV and awkward postures were combined. Sitting by itself does not increase the risk of LBP. However, sitting for more than half a workday, in combination with WBV and/or awkward postures, does increase the likelihood of having LBP and/or sciatica, and it is the combination of those risk factors, which leads to the greatest increase in LBP.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗