Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 156528

Predetermined time standards: their application in workshop settings.

Abstract

There is a need for a simple, quickly applied tool which can correlate performance of the handicapped individual with that of the able-bodied worker and be easily utilized by nontechnical personnel. Efforts at both the Cerebral Palsy Center and the Rehabilitation Center in Atlanta demonstrated that the third generation of Methods-Time-Measurement (MTM-3) satisfies these criteria. As every motion involved in an operation is detailed and a corresponding time value applied, the over-all result reflects a normal rate of accomplishment more accurately than the usual methods and is especially useful in bidding jobs for the workshop. MTM-3 also has a place in the evaluation section to verify or correct existing standards on bench-type work samples and to develop more meaningful time distribution charts relating to a specific population at a center. In studies of disabled individuals, MTM-3 yields a more accurate determination of the actual degree of disability than the American Medical Association's existing estimated percentages in regard to motor skills.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H C Todd, S B Chyatte, R S Decker. 1979. Predetermined time standards: their application in workshop settings.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/156528/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

On health, ability and activity: comments on some basic notions in the ICF.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to highlight and at the same time criticize the holistic view of health expressed in the "International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)". Particular attention will be paid to the idea suggested in the ICF that not only the ability to perform a specified action but also its actual performance is included in the person's health. My argument intends to show that this is an untenable position. METHOD: The theoretical platform of this paper is philosophical action theory. My argument makes particular use of the distinctions between ability, opportunity, activity and will. My analysis also uses some insights from the contemporary philosophical discussion of health concepts. CONCLUSIONS: Ability (or capacity) and its opposite disability (or incapacity) are essential ingredients in the implicit philosophy of health of the ICF. However, the ICF also puts an emphasis on the actual performance of actions. This is entailed by the performance qualifier that is included in the ICF. I give some arguments for questioning the relevance of this qualifier if it is intended to have a place in the concept of health or have a general function for decisions in health care or rehabilitation. Instead I suggest the introduction of an opportunity qualifier, which could fulfill some of the purposes intended for the performance qualifier.

Persons with Disabilities↗