Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 15649356

Decision making.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jeffrey D Schall. 2005-01-11. Decision making.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.009

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A choice experiment of the residential preference of waste management services - the example of Kagoshima city, Japan.

Municipal governments have attempted to reduce waste disposal and increase recycling rates in Japan. However, it is difficult to get full cooperation from residents. Using experiments in which residents are given an opportunity to choose the components of the waste management system (choice experiments), we measure the cost of each characteristic of the waste collection services. The estimation result reveals that there are trade-offs between the risk, payments, and handling costs. The marginal loss in utility revenues from an increase in the types of waste being separated is almost 200 yen (US$ 1.74) and a 1% increase in the recycling rate raises the cost of service by 53 yen (US$ 0.46). In addition, the results show the need for communications about risks between municipal authorities and residents.

Choice Behavior↗

Insurer-provider integration, credible commitment, and managed-care backlash.

People distrust managed care organizations (MCOs) more than traditional health plans. This phenomenon has become known as "managed-care backlash." Using a model of the interaction between insurers, physicians, and patients, this paper identifies two possible motivations for MCO backlash. The first, which comes from traditional health plans' superior ability to credibly commit to providing better than least-cost care, is efficiency promoting. The second, which arises when patients are able to obtain higher-benefit treatments through reneging on their initial insurance contracts through "doctor shopping," may reduce efficiency.

Choice Behavior↗

Evidence based contraceptive choices.

People who attend for contraceptive advice have usually formulated an idea of the type of contraceptive that will suit them best. They may wish to use a method that is long, short or medium acting. These are defined as follows: Long-acting method requires renewal no more frequently than every 3 months (e.g. injectable or intrauterine). Short-acting method used daily or with every act of intercourse (e.g. pills, condoms) Medium-acting method requires renewal weekly or monthly (e.g. ring, patch). For men the choice is limited to condoms or vasectomy. Some women do not wish to use hormonal preparations or have an intrauterine device (IUD) or implant inserted. There may also be cultural influences making certain methods of contraception unacceptable. Each of these factors influences the final decision of which method of contraception is decided upon. In addition to taking a full medical and sexual history to identify any risks to the individual's health, which might be increased by a particular contraceptive, time must be spent discussing the options available. It is important to ensure that there is a full understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of each method. The most successful contraceptive method is likely to be the one that the woman (or man) chooses, rather than the one the clinician chooses for them. Access for women to contraception can be improved by having convenient clinic times and service developments such as nurse prescribing and Patient Group Directions.

Choice Behavior↗