PubMed · 15638449
Available technology assists managers with fiscally sound predictions of staffing and secondary patient care resources.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Tara Dugan Claudio. 2004. Questioning workload resources.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006247-200410000-00009
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Setting as central theme the response of stakeholders to the challenges and offers of Risk Analysis, the paper proposes an approach meant to facilitate risk communication: mapping risk from the hazards perspective--that is, emphasizing the consequence-related factor in the standard risk representations. A working demonstration is presented to illustrate the concept, in relation to a decision support system (DSS) design that has caught, over the past few years, the interest of several authorities and forae in Switzerland and elsewhere, providing for useful exchanges between the risk community and stakeholders from major industries, infrastructure operations, finances and other areas.
This paper discusses a collaborative project (1) to demonstrate the feasibility and benefit of a system seeking early review, in a 'quasi peer review' mode, of nuclear accident plume and dose assessment predictions by four major international nuclear accident emergency response systems before release of calculations to respective national authorities followed by (2) sharing these results with responsible national/international authorities, (3) development of an affordable/accessible system to distribute results to countries without prediction capabilities and (4) utilisation for exercises and collaboration studies. The project exploits Internet browser technology and low-cost PC hardware, incorporates an Internet node, with access control, for depositing a minimal set of XML-based graphics files for presentation in an identical map format. Side-by-side viewing and televideo conferencing will permit rapid evaluation, data elaboration and recalculation (if necessary) and should produce strong consensus among decision makers. Successful completion affords easy utilisation by national/international organisations and non-nuclear states at risk of trans-boundary incursion.
This paper looks at the key issues that need to be addressed during the transition from the emergency phase to the late phase of a radioactive release, and the development of the initial late phase strategy. It discusses the extent to which current national plans and international advice address the needs of decision makers following contamination of inhabited areas and food production systems. Based on this the following recommendations are made: (1) the issues that will arise at the start of the late phase response to a radioactive release require preparation work in advance of any release; (2) this preparation should consider the adequacy of legislation, technical data and modelling, options for waste storage and disposal, resources for monitoring and implementing clean up; (3) late phase preparedness requires regular exercising and (4) the possibility of terrorist releases adds further emphasis to the need for preparedness for the late phase.