Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 15623266

A randomized study to decrease the use of potentially inappropriate medications among community-dwelling older adults in a southeastern managed care organization.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite progress in describing the problem of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use, there have been few prospective studies demonstrating that interventions with specific medication criteria can make a difference in decreasing the use of problematic drugs in older adults. OBJECTIVE: To design an intervention study to change physician behavior regarding PIM prescribing to older patients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A prospective randomized block design was used during an 18-month period from January 2001 to June 2002. The study population was primary care physicians (n = 355) in the Medicare + Choice product line of a southeastern managed care organization and their patients 65 years and older. There were 170 physicians in the treatment group and 185 in the control group. Physicians were assigned to the treatment or usual-care, groups using a randomization table, and each group included physicians who had and had not prescribed a PIM. RESULTS: Approximately 71% (84/118) of the physicians in the intervention group who prescribed a PIM completed and faxed back at least 1 potentially inappropriate medication form to the managed care organization. On 15.4% (260/1692) of the medication forms, physicians made some change regarding PIM use. CONCLUSIONS: Although many studies have addressed medication use among older adults, intervention studies aimed at influencing physician prescribing in this population are limited. This study describes a low-cost, replicable method to contact and educate physicians on drug therapy issues in older adults.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Donna M Fick, J Ross Maclean, Nancy A Rodriguez, Louise Short, Richard Vanden Heuvel, Jennifer L Waller, Rebecca L Rogers. 2004. A randomized study to decrease the use of potentially inappropriate medications among community-dwelling older adults in a southeastern managed care organization.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15623266/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Quality management: reduced waiting time and enhanced efficiency in a university ear, nose, and throat outpatient department].

BACKGROUND: The introduction of Diagnosis-Related Groups, which standardize payment for each clinical service, entails keeping the inpatient treatment as short as possible. Thus outpatient treatment is gaining in importance. To cope with this change, organizational and structural modifications of clinic routine are necessary. METHODS: In the ear, nose, and throat outpatient clinic of Johann Wolfgang Goethe University in Frankfurt, Germany, a hotline was established that allows patients to make appointments and get advice based on quality management guidelines according to DIN EN ISO 9001:2000. The development of this project is described here step by step, from planning to inclusion in the daily clinic routine. RESULTS: Patient visits became more effective despite increasing demand. This resulted in high satisfaction of patients and clinic personnel alike. CONCLUSION: This model may contribute considerably to coping with the increasing demand for clinic appointments and to optimal use of a clinic's human resources.

Academic Medical Centers↗

The future of academic surgery--a consensus conference held at the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2 September 2005.

A consensus conference organised by the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (ASGBI) and the Association of Surgeons of Training (ASIT) was held at the Royal College of Surgeons of England on 2 September 2005. All Specialist Advisory Committees and specialist associations were represented, except for orthopaedic surgery. The future of both academic surgery and training were discussed. We concluded that the European Working Time Directive, and Modernising Medical Careers are likely to have an adverse effect on future of research in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Most surgeons were concerned about the future of training and the development of surgery in general.

Academic Medical Centers↗

Growing pains for NIH grant review.

The grant review system at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the main mechanism by which NIH identifies research worthy of support, has been through a major overhaul. Scientists who spearheaded the change say it is time to assess how the new system is working.

Academic Medical Centers↗