Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 1561314

Intermediate dosimetric quantities.

Abstract

The transfer of energy from ionizing radiation to matter involves a series of steps. In wide ranges of their energy spectra photons and neutrons transfer energy to an irradiated medium almost exclusively by the production of charged particles which ionize and thereby produce electrons that can ionize in turn. The examination of these processes leads to a series of intermediate quantities. One of these is kerma, which has long been employed as a measure of the energy imparted in the first of the interactions. It depends only on the fluence of uncharged particles and is therefore--unlike absorbed dose and electron fluence--insensitive to local differences of receptor geometry and composition. An analogous quantity for charged-particle fields, cema (converted energy per unit mass), is defined, which quantifies the energy imparted in terms of the interactions of charged particles, disregarding energy dissipation by secondary electrons. Cema can be expressed as an integral over the fluence of ions times their stopping power. However, complications arise when the charged particles are electrons, and when their fluence cannot be separated from that of the secondaries. The resulting difficulty can be circumvented by the definition of reduced cema. This quantity corresponds largely to the concept employed in the cavity theory of Spencer and Attix. In reduced cema not all secondary electrons but all electrons below a chosen cutoff energy, delta, are considered to be absorbed locally. When the cutoff energy is reduced, cema approaches absorbed dose and thereby becomes sensitive to highly local differences in geometry or composition. With larger values of delta, reduced cema is a useful parameter to specify the dose-generating potential of a charged-particle field 'free in air' or in vacuo. It is nearly equal to the mean absorbed dose in a sphere with radius equal to the range of electrons of energy delta. Reduced cema is a function of the fluence at the specified location at and above the chosen cutoff energy. Its definition requires a modification of restricted linear collision stopping power, L delta, and it is recommended that the definition of L delta be so changed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A M Kellerer, K Hahn, H H Rossi. 1992. Intermediate dosimetric quantities.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1561314/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A new method for the estimation of the aqueous solubility of organic compounds.

Using a semiempirical quantum chemical method (AM1), various properties (dipole moment, charge distribution, geometrical parameters, etc.) of 331 compounds were calculated. Various linear functions of these properties and their combinations were fitted to reproduce experimental aqueous solubilities. An 18-parameter function was derived that is reasonably simple, yet appears to be able to describe the aqueous solubilities of a wide range of organic compounds. The parameter set is essentially the one used in a recent similar study of octanol-water partition coefficients. The derived equation has important predictive value.

Models, Theoretical

Generalized multiple-regression techniques with interaction and nonlinearity for system identification in biological treatment processes.

A class of multiple regression models, called "generalized multiple-regression" (GMR) is proposed. GMR has the advantages of being easy and rapid to fit, and uses standard multilinear regression software. It has an advantage over ARIMA models in modeling nonlinearity and linear and nonlinear interactions among variables. Its main disadvantage is that, if there are many independent variables, the reduction of degrees of freedom may be important. It is less parsimonious than other models, but availability of increased computational power makes this not a serious disadvantage. The GMR models are compared to autoregressive transfer function models and feedforward back propagation neural network models. In the case of modeling effluent volatile suspended solids, GMR models were superior to both linear autoregressive models and neural network models. The neural network models did, however, outperform the linear models. In the case of modeling sludge volume index, both GMR and the neural network model were unable to improve upon ARIMA models. It was concluded that ARIMA models may, in some cases, produce the most parsimonious model, but in other cases they may miss important process behaviors. The GMR models showed robust capability to describe complex data.

Models, Theoretical