PubMed · 15612349
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Adrian Becker. 2004. An interview with Adrian Becker.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15612349/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
This study investigated whether there were differences between the debond stress and adhesive remnant index (ARI) of an adhesive cured with three different orthodontic light sources. Sixty sound premolar teeth were divided into three groups of 20. A standard pre-adjusted edgewise premolar bracket (Victory Series) was bonded to each tooth using a light-cured orthodontic adhesive, Transbond X. Group 1 (control) specimens were cured with an Ortholux XT (tungsten-quartz-halogen bulb) light for 20 seconds, group 2 with an Ortho lite (plasma arc) for 6 seconds and group 3 with an Ortholux LED light-emitting diode for 10 seconds. The specimens were debonded 24 hours later using a universal mechanical testing machine, operating at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm minute(-1). The Weibull modulus and a Logrank test showed no statistically significant differences between the three groups for debond stress. The ARI was assessed at x10 magnification. The ARI scores for group 2 were significantly different (P < 0.01) from those of groups 1 and 3 (between which there was no significant difference). For group 2 there was a greater tendency for failure to occur at the adhesive/tooth interface than for the other two groups. There appears to be no reason why any of the three types of light source cannot be used in orthodontics. Polymerization, as effective as that produced by conventional bulb light sources, was obtained with the short exposure times recommended for the plasma arc or light-emitting diode sources.
OBJECTIVES: Two 3-dimensional models, one of a lower second premolar and one of a lower central incisor were used to investigate effects of load on the location and magnitude of cervical strains. METHODS: Point loads of 100 N were applied to the model premolar (at the cusp tip, parallel and 45 degrees to the long axis of the tooth) and incisor (at the mid-buccal point on incisal edge, parallel and 45 degrees to the long axis of the tooth). Outputs were presented in the form of tensile-strain contours and vector plots. RESULTS: Strains were concentrated near the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) regardless of load direction, and oblique loading showed higher tensile strains, opposite to the point of loading, than vertical loading for both models. For the premolar model, regardless of loading direction, strains were concentrated at the mid- buccal CEJ. In contrast, under vertical loading on the incisor model, tensile strains were concentrated at the line-angle of CEJ. From oblique loads, vector plots of both models showed tensile vectors in vertical directions while vertical loads showed tensile vectors in horizontal directions. CONCLUSION: Mechanisms of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) may in part be due the changing orientation of tensile strains as well as their magnitude. Stress concentration at the CEJ related well to the common location of clinical NCCLs. The crown-root morphology may have an influence on the initial location of non-carious cervical lesions.
In the present study, periapical radiographs were analyzed to investigate the number of canals of the buccal root of maxillary 1st premolars with longitudinal sulcus, and compare the number of apical foramina observed on the radiographs to that revealed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Thirty-nine human maxillary 1st premolars had their crowns and palatal roots removed and the root canals (C) were explored with endodontic files until the tip of the instrument was visualized exiting the apical foramen/foramina (AF). Radiographs were taken with files inside the root canals and the specimens were classified as follows: 1C/1AF; 2C/2AF; 1C/2AF; 2C/1AF. Apices were examined under SEM and the number of apical foramina (considering those measuring >80 microm in diameter) was recorded. Only 17.1% (n=6) of the specimens had 1C/1AF; 77.2% (n=27) had 2AF in which 42.9% (n=15) had 2C and 34.3% (n=12) had 1C; 5.7% (n=2) had 2C/1AF. SEM examinations showed that 46.1% (n=18) of the specimens had 2AF; 23.1% (n=9) had 1AF; 23.1% (n=9) had 3AF; 7.7% (n=3) had 4AF. Radiographic and SEM findings for the number of AF coincided in 62.8% of the cases. A buccal longitudinal sulcus in the maxillary 1st premolar is usually accompanied by total bifurcation (42.9%) or apical bifurcation (34.3%) of the root canal. SEM identified a statistically higher number of apical foramina than radiographs (p<0.01).