Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 1559163

Neglect and visual recognition.

Abstract

B.Q., a right-handed woman who had suffered a stroke affecting the right parietal region, showed visuospatial neglect and problems in recognizing seen objects and faces. Investigation of her visual recognition problems revealed a striking inability to identify the left sides of chimaeric objects and faces. Often, B.Q. would deny that the stimulus was chimaeric at all, and she was remarkably poor (though above chance) at discriminating chimaeric from normal faces. Even when left-sided details had been accurately traced or described, they were often either ignored in reporting the identities of the constituent parts of a chimaeric or assimilated in some way to the information from the right side. Neglect of the left side was more pronounced for chimaerics which approximated an individual face or object. It occurred regardless of the chimaeric's position in B.Q.'s field of vision, and was found with brief (200 ms) presentations of stimuli confined to her (perimetrically intact) right visual field. When chimaeric faces were inverted, B.Q. continued to neglect the side of the chimaeric falling to her left, which implies that the neglect did not operate in entirely object-centered coordinates. However, left-sided information could be used if it was critical in determining the identity of an object or a face. We suggest that this could explain B.Q.'s lack of neglect of individual words, for which left-sided (initial) letters are often crucial to successful recognition. An account of her deficit is proposed, involving an interaction between moderately defective pick-up of left-sided information in an object-based coding system and preserved access to stored representations of familiar visual stimuli.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A W Young, D J Hellawell, J Welch. 1992. Neglect and visual recognition.. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain%2F115.1.51

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A low glycaemic index breakfast cereal preferentially prevents children's cognitive performance from declining throughout the morning.

This study investigated whether the glycaemic index (GI) of breakfast cereal differentially affects children's attention and memory. Using a balanced cross-over design, on two consecutive mornings 64 children aged 6-11 years were given a high GI cereal and a low GI cereal in a counterbalanced order. They performed a series of computerised tests of attention and memory, once prior to breakfast and three times following breakfast at hourly intervals. The results indicate that children's performance declines throughout the morning and that this decline can be significantly reduced following the intake of a low GI cereal as compared with a high GI cereal on measures of accuracy of attention (M=-6.742 and -13.510, respectively, p<0.05) and secondary memory (M=-30.675 and -47.183, respectively, p<0.05).

Attention↗

Inhibitory control test is a simple method to diagnose minimal hepatic encephalopathy and predict development of overt hepatic encephalopathy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare inhibitory control test (ICT), a simple/rapid test of attention, to a standard psychometric battery (SPT) to diagnose minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) and predict development of overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) in cirrhotic patients. METHODS: Fifty nonalcoholic cirrhotics and 50 age/educational-status-matched controls were given ICT and SPT in the same sitting. Performance impaired beyond two standard deviations of controls was considered MHE in cirrhotics. ICT results (lure/target response and lures/person) were compared between controls and cirrhotics and within cirrhotics with/without MHE. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was used to study ICT for MHE diagnosis. Twenty subjects were administered SPT and ICT twice to assess test-retest reliability. All cirrhotics were followed routinely for the development of OHE. RESULTS: Cirrhotics performed worse than controls on SPT and ICT. Using SPT, 39 cirrhotics had MHE. ICT was administered faster than SPT (15 vs 37 min). Cirrhotics with MHE had significantly higher lure (28%vs 3%) and lower target response (91%vs 96%) compared with those without MHE. Lure/person >5 had 90% sensitivity/specificity for MHE diagnosis. AUC for receiver-operating characteristic for lures alone was 95.8%. Lure and target responses were highly correlated (r= 0.9) between sessions showing high test-retest reliability. Five (10%) patients developed OHE on f/u of 26 +/- 10 months; all five had been diagnosed with MHE using ICT and SPT. None of the five patients with discordant results on SPT and ICT developed OHE. CONCLUSIONS: ICT has good sensitivity/specificity for MHE diagnosis, is reliable and is equivalent to SPT for predicting OHE development.

Attention↗