PubMed · 15581332
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Thomas Hedner, Sverre E Kjeldsen, Anders Himmelmann. 2004. Valuable lessons from VALUE.. https://doi.org/10.1080/080370504100000912
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric method (LC-MS/MS) for quantifying amlodipine in human plasma was developed and validated. Sample preparation was based on liquid-liquid extraction using NaOH and a mixture of ethyl acetate/hexane (80/20; v/v). Chromatography was performed on a C-18 analytical column and the retention times were 1.9 and 3.0 min for amlodipine and nimodipine (internal standard), respectively. The ionization was optimized using ESI(+) and enhanced selectivity was achieved using tandem mass spectrometric analysis via two MRM functions, 409 --> 238 and 418 --> 343 for amlodipine and nimodipine. The calibration curve ranged from 0.2 to 20.0 ng/mL. The inter-day precision and accuracy and the relative standard deviation (RSD) were <15%. The analyte was shown to be stable over the time-scale of the whole procedure. The robustness of the method was demonstrated by the good reproducibility of the results obtained during the analysis of clinical samples.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The L/N-type calcium channel blocker (CCB) cilnidipine has been demonstrated to suppress progressive renal disease in a variety of experimental models, but the characteristic effects of N-type calcium channel blocking action on renal injury have not been examined in detail. Therefore, we investigated the beneficial effects of cilnidipine on renal injury in Dahl salt-sensitive (Dahl S) rats fed a high-sucrose diet (HSD), which mimics metabolic syndrome, and compared them with the effects of an L-type CCB, amlodipine. METHODS: Male Dahl S rats were divided into groups with similar blood pressure at 8 weeks of age and fed an HSD. They received vehicle, cilnidipine or amlodipine for 27 weeks. At 35 weeks of age, urine and blood samples were collected for physiological analysis, and the kidneys were removed for histopathological evaluation. RESULTS: Cilnidipine reduced albuminuria, glomerular hypertrophy, glomerular expression of ICAM-1, ED-1-positive cell infiltration and interstitial fibrosis compared with vehicle-treated rats. In contrast, amlodipine had no effect on these parameters. Urinary norepinephrine excretion, renal expression of renin mRNA and renal tissue levels of angiotensin II were increased only in the amlodipine-treated group. CONCLUSION: Cilnidipine provided superior protection against renal damage compared with amlodipine in Dahl S rats given an HSD. The different effects between these two drugs may be partly explained by their different actions on the renal sympathetic nerve activity and the renin-angiotensin system through the N-type calcium channel blocking action.