Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15575702

Simultaneous in vitro protein synthesis using solid-phase DNA template.

Mary Kate W DiTursi·Junhoe Cha·Matthew R Newman·Jonathan S Dordick
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In vitro protein synthesis is rapidly becoming an accepted tool in functional genomic analysis. We have demonstrated the in vitro synthesis of firefly luciferase on solid-phase template DNA, bound to wells in 96-well plates, using simultaneous transcription and translation in a wheat-germ extract system. The bound DNA template was stable and did not release during transcription. Coupled translation resulted in ca. 1.2 ng/microL luciferase synthesized, which is ca. one-fifth of that synthesized using conventional solution-phase coupled transcription and translation. Reuse of the DNA template was influenced by the complexity of the wheat-germ extract, which resulted in fouling of the transcription surface and reduction of protein synthesis after extended use. The approach developed in this study may enable the development of high-throughput, microscale protein synthesis platforms for use in functional genomic analysis.

Explore related subjects

Cell-Free SystemDNALuciferasesPhase TransitionTemplates, GeneticTriticumJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mary Kate W DiTursi, Junhoe Cha, Matthew R Newman, Jonathan S Dordick. Simultaneous in vitro protein synthesis using solid-phase DNA template.. https://doi.org/10.1021/bp049772f

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Effects of growth rate on cell extract performance in cell-free protein synthesis.

Cell-free protein synthesis is a useful research tool and now stands poised to compete with in vivo expression for commercial production of proteins. However, both the extract preparation and protein synthesis procedures must be scaled up. A key challenge is producing the required amount of biomass that also results in highly active cell-free extracts. In this work, we show that the growth rate of the culture dramatically affects extract performance. Extracts prepared from cultures with a specific growth rate of 0.7/h or higher produced approximately 0.9 mg/mL of chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) in a batch reaction. In contrast, when the source culture growth rate was 0.3/h, the resulting extract produced only 0.5 mg/mL CAT. Examination of the ribosome content in the extracts revealed that the growth rate of the source cells strongly influenced the final ribosome concentration. Polysome analysis of cell-free protein synthesis reactions indicated that about 22% of the total 70S ribosomes are in polysomes for all extracts regardless of growth rate. Furthermore, the overall specific production from the 70S ribosomes is about 22 CAT proteins per ribosome over the course of the reaction in all cases. It appears that rapid culture growth rates are essential for producing a productive extract. However, growth rate does not seem to influence specific ribosome activity. Rather, the increase in extract productivity is a result of a higher ribosome concentration. These results are important for cell-free technology and also suggest an assay for intrinsic in vivo protein synthesis activity.

Cell-Free System↗
PubMed2006

Regulation of transcription factor latency by receptor-activated proteolysis.

The transcription factor Stp1 is endoproteolytically processed in response to extracellular amino acids by the plasma membrane SPS (Ssy1-Ptr3-Ssy5)-sensor. Processed Stp1, lacking a cytoplasmic retention motif, enters the nucleus and induces amino acid transporter gene expression. The SPS-sensor component Ssy5 is a chymotrypsin-like protease with a Pro-domain and a catalytic domain. The Pro-domain, required for protease maturation, is autolytically cleaved from the catalytic domain but remains associated, forming an inactive protease complex that binds Stp1. Stp1 is processed only after amino acid-induced signals cause the dissociation of the inhibitory Pro-domain. Our findings demonstrate that gene expression can be controlled by regulating the enzymatic activity of an intracellular endoprotease.

Cell-Free System↗
PubMed2006

Co-translational binding of GroEL to nascent polypeptides is followed by post-translational encapsulation by GroES to mediate protein folding.

The eubacterial chaperonins GroEL and GroES are essential chaperones and primarily assist protein folding in the cell. Although the molecular mechanism of the GroEL system has been examined previously, the mechanism by which GroEL and GroES assist folding of nascent polypeptides during translation is still poorly understood. We previously demonstrated a co-translational involvement of the Escherichia coli GroEL in folding of newly synthesized polypeptides using a reconstituted cell-free translation system (Ying, B. W., Taguchi, H., Kondo, M., and Ueda, T. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 12035-12040). Employing the same system here, we further characterized the mechanism by which GroEL assists folding of translated proteins via encapsulation into the GroEL-GroES cavity. The stable co-translational association between GroEL and the newly synthesized polypeptide is dependent on the length of the nascent chain. Furthermore, GroES is capable of interacting with the GroEL-nascent peptide-ribosome complex, and experiments using a single-ring variant of GroEL clearly indicate that GroES association occurs only at the trans-ring, not the cis-ring, of GroEL. GroEL holds the nascent chain on the ribosome in a polypeptide length-dependent manner and post-translationally encapsulates the polypeptide using the GroES cap to accomplish the chaperonin-mediated folding process.

Cell-Free System↗