Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 15560042

Hepatobiliary malignancy.

Abstract

Chronic cholestatic liver disease may be complicated by hepatobiliary malignancy. The early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma is of paramount importance in the evaluation of candidates for liver transplantation, which remains the only effective treatment modality for advanced primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. This article reviews the identification of patients at high risk, current techniques for diagnosis, and makes recommendations for screening high-risk patients. This article also reviews preliminary data from the Mayo Clinic regarding liver transplantation for cholangiocarcinoma following radiation therapy.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B A Jones, G J Gores. 1998. Hepatobiliary malignancy.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1089-3261(05)70017-9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Surgical therapy of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma].

BACKGROUND: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary hepatic malignancy. Tumor resection is the treatment of choice, but so far the value of hepatic resection has not been well defined. We report results with an aggressive surgical approach for the treatment of this tumor entity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between April 1998 and June 2004, 54 liver resections were performed in 120 patients with ICC. In 24 patients, 39 additional procedures were performed: resection of hilar bifurcation (n=18), partial resection of diaphragm (n=6), vascular resection and reconstruction (n=15). RESULTS: There were 30 R0, 21 R1, and three R2 resections. After R1/R2 resection and explorative laparotomy, the median survival times are 9 months and 6 months, respectively. Following R0 resection, the calculated median survival is 46 months, and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates are 83%, 58%, and 48%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The presented data show that R0 resection leads to a significant prolongation of survival in patients with ICC. In contrast, incomplete tumor removal does not provide a survival benefit. These results justify an aggressive surgical approach to achieve a R0 resection. The low resectability rate of less than 50% underlines the need for improved preoperative staging.

Bile Duct Neoplasms↗

Cholangiocarcinoma.

Cholangiocarcinoma is a devastating malignancy that presents late, is notoriously difficult to diagnose, and is associated with a high mortality. The incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is increasing worldwide. The cause for this rise is unclear, although it could be related to an interplay between predisposing genetic factors and environmental triggers. MRI and CT with endoscopic ultrasound and PET provide useful diagnostic information in certain patients. Surgical resection is the only chance for cure, with results depending on careful technique and patient selection. Data suggest that liver transplantation could offer long-term survival in selected patients when combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy have been ineffective for patients with inoperable tumours. For most of these patients biliary drainage is the mainstay of palliation. However, controversy exists over the type and positioning of biliary stents. Photodynamic treatment is a new palliative technique that might improve quality of life.

Bile Duct Neoplasms↗

Early diagnosis of pancreatobiliary duct malignancies by brush cytology and biopsy.

Two hundred and five preoperative intraductal samplings (brushing and biopsy) were evaluated from 113 patients with biliary or Wirsung duct strictures. One hundred and three strictures could be specified by histology of the operative specimens, autopsy, or by the patients' clinical course. Preoperative diagnostic efficacy depended on the tumor location (it was the best for ampullary and para-papillary tumors), but the average quantitative indices for sensitivity, absolute sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, diagnostic accuracy of cytology were 53%, 20%, 100%, 100%, 25%, 59%, respectively. The same values for biopsy were 43%, 34%, 100%, 100%, 36% and 56%. These figures improved after simultaneous cytology and biopsy. Close cooperation with the endoscopist was necessary in cases of negative, inconclusive and dysplastic (27%) samples. Repetition of sampling improved the results by 8%. Among the 26 preoperative false negative cases, sampling-, technical- and interpretative errors occurred in 84%, 4% and 12%, respectively. Revision of samples revealed 4 malignant cases among the false negative cytologic brushings. Reclassification of specimens considering the latest criteria - primary and secondary malignant features, pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanINs), etc. - resulted in improvement of the diagnostic efficiency.

Bile Duct Neoplasms↗