Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 15547486

[Peroperative functional mapping using direct electrical stimulations. Methodological considerations].

Abstract

The interindividual anatomo-functional variability of the central nervous system implies that brain surgery within eloquent regions may induce neurological sequelae. Consequently, several methods of functional mapping were developed, both preoperative non-invasive neurofunctional imaging and intraoperative cortico-subcortical electrical stimulations. While this technique was reported as safe, accurate, reliable and reproducible in the recent literature, a rigorous methodology is nevertheless mandatory in order to avoid any error in the detection of the so-called eloquent structures. Indeed, an erroneous mapping could lead to prematurely interrupting the resection (false positive), or to generate a postoperative permanent deficit due to the removal of critical areas interpreted as non-essential to function (false negative). The goal of the present review is to recall the electrophysiological principles of direct brain stimulations, and to consider the selection of stimulation parameters according to a theoretical approach, in order to adapt in practice the methods to each patient. The results reported in the literature are then analyzed, concerning the clinico-surgical contribution of intraoperative electrical mapping (in terms of extent of surgical indications, minimization of risk of permanent deficit, and quality of resection), their methodological interest (e.g. validation of neurofunctional imaging techniques), and their contribution to neurosciences (better understanding of the pathophysiology of brain structures, of the connectivity, and of the dynamic mechanisms underlying plasticity).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Duffau. 2004. [Peroperative functional mapping using direct electrical stimulations. Methodological considerations].. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0028-3770(04)98328-2

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Central representation of dynamics when manipulating handheld objects.

To explore the neural mechanisms related to representation of the manipulation dynamics of objects, we performed whole-brain fMRI while subjects balanced an object in stable and highly unstable states and while they balanced a rigid object and a flexible object in the same unstable state, in all cases without vision. In this way, we varied the extent to which an internal model of the manipulation dynamics was required in the moment-to-moment control of the object's orientation. We hypothesized that activity in primary motor cortex would reflect the amount of muscle activation under each condition. In contrast, we hypothesized that cerebellar activity would be more strongly related to the stability and complexity of the manipulation dynamics because the cerebellum has been implicated in internal model-based control. As hypothesized, the dynamics-related activation of the cerebellum was quite different from that of the primary motor cortex. Changes in cerebellar activity were much greater than would have been predicted from differences in muscle activation when the stability and complexity of the manipulation dynamics were contrasted. On the other hand, the activity of the primary motor cortex more closely resembled the mean motor output necessary to execute the task. We also discovered a small region near the anterior edge of the ipsilateral (right) inferior parietal lobule where activity was modulated with the complexity of the manipulation dynamics. We suggest that this is related to imagining the location and motion of an object with complex manipulation dynamics.

Brain Mapping↗

Volumetric localization of epileptic activities in tuberous sclerosis using synthetic aperture magnetometry.

BACKGROUND: Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a novel noninvasive technique for localizing epileptic zones. Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is often associated with medically refractory epilepsy with multiple epileptic zones. Surgical treatment of TSC requires accurate localization of epileptogenic tubers. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to introduce a new MEG technique, synthetic aperture magnetometry (SAM), to volumetrically localize irritable zones and clarify the correlations between SAM, dipole modeling and anatomical tubers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight pediatric patients with TSC confirmed by clinical and neuroimaging findings were retrospectively studied. MEG data were recorded using a whole-cortex CTF OMEGA system. Sleep deprivation was employed to provoke epileptiform activity. Irritable zones were localized using both dipole modeling and SAM. RESULTS: MRI detected 42 tubers in the eight patients. Dipole modeling localized 28 irritable zones, and 19 out of the 28 zones were near tubers (19/42, 45%). SAM found 51 irritable zones, and 31 out of the 51 zones were near tubers (31/42, 74%). Among the 51 irritable zones determined by SAM, thirty-five zones were in 1-35 Hz, nine zones were in 35-60 Hz, and seven zones were in 60-120 Hz. CONCLUSIONS: The new method, SAM, yielded very plausible equivalent sources for patients who showed anatomical tubers on MRI. Compared to conventional dipole modeling, SAM appeared to offer increased detection of irritable zones and beneficial volumetric and frequency descriptions.

Brain Mapping↗