Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 15544119

[Urethral catheterization].

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Steen Walter. 2004-10-18. [Urethral catheterization].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15544119/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Systematic comparison of four sources of drug information regarding adjustment of dose for renal function.

OBJECTIVE: To compare advice on dosage adjustment for renal impairment provided by four commonly used secondary pharmacotherapeutic sources. DESIGN: Systematic comparison of the definitions of renal impairment, recommendations for dosage adjustment, and the evidence in support of these recommendations in four information sources. DATA SOURCES: British National Formulary, Martindale: the Complete Drug Reference, American Hospital Formulary System Drug Information, and Drug Prescribing in Renal Failure. REVIEW METHODS: Two reviewers independently extracted data on recommendations for dosage adjustment for impaired renal function of 100 drugs often used in our hospital. RESULTS: The four sources differed in their recommendations for adjustments of dosage and dosing interval. They vary in their definitions of renal impairment; some are qualitative and remain unclear. All sources provide only a general description; the methods on which the advice is based and references for original data are rarely presented. CONCLUSIONS: The remarkable variation in definitions and recommendations, along with scarce details of the methods used to reach this advice, makes the available sources of drug information ill suited for clinical use. The methods used to retrieve information and use data should be described and made available to the reader. Advice on drug prescription, dose and dosing interval, contraindications, and adverse effects should be evidence based.

Contraindications↗

[Systemic fibrinolytic therapy using urokinase in central retinal artery occlusion. A case study].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Systemic fibrinolysis has become an important therapeutical option in patients with thrombotic occlusion of coronary or pulmonary arteries. In view of the hemorrhagic risk systemic fibrinolytic therapy for retinal vessel occlusion has been discussed controversial. In the present case study results and complications of systemic fibrinolysis should be investigated in patients with central retinal artery occlusion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1995 to 2002 a case series of 19 consecutive patients (8 female, 11 male, age: 63.2+/-14,3 years) with central retinal artery occlusion were treated by systemic application of urokinase using a standardized scheme. The latency from initial symptoms until the initiation of therapy and the medical history of the patients were documented. Visual acuity was determined on admission and before discharge and possible complications were documented. Additionally, screening investigations for genetic thrombophilia were performed. RESULTS: 15 patients showed an improvement of the visual acuity (79 %, 95 %-KI: 54 %-94 %). For 3 patients no improvement and for one patient a decrease of the visual acuity was determined. Hemorrhagic complications were observed in two patients (11 %, 95 %-KI: 1 %-33 %). As these minor bleedings were self-limiting the fibrinolytic therapy was discontinued only in one patient. As risk factors most commonly arterial hypertension (68 %) and smoking (26 %) were identified. In 4 patients a genetic thrombophilia was diagnosed. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the poor prognosis of central retinal artery occlusion and the disappointing results of conservative treatment, an improvement of the visual acuity in the absence of critical complications was observed with systemic fibrinolytic therapy in the presented case study. However, only controlled trials can provide proof for the effect of fibrinolysis versus spontaneous improvement.

Contraindications↗