Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 15527956

Bio-steps beyond Turing.

Abstract

Are there 'biologically computing agents' capable to compute Turing uncomputable functions? It is perhaps tempting to dismiss this question with a negative answer. Quite the opposite, for the first time in the literature on molecular computing we contend that the answer is not theoretically negative. Our results will be formulated in the language of membrane computing (P systems). Some mathematical results presented here are interesting in themselves. In contrast with most speed-up methods which are based on non-determinism, our results rest upon some universality results proved for deterministic P systems. These results will be used for building "accelerated P systems". In contrast with the case of Turing machines, acceleration is a part of the hardware (not a quality of the environment) and it is realised either by decreasing the size of "reactors" or by speeding-up the communication channels. Consequently, two acceleration postulates of biological inspiration are introduced; each of them poses specific questions to biology. Finally, in a more speculative part of the paper, we will deal with Turing non-computability activity of the brain and possible forms of (extraterrestrial) intelligence.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Cristian S Calude, Gheorghe Păun. 2004. Bio-steps beyond Turing.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2004.05.032

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Time-resolved transcriptomics of S. cerevisiae and S. pastorianus in response to plasma membrane stresses.

Yeasts are beneficial microorganisms for human society and are utilized for academic and industrial purposes. For academic purposes, S. cerevisiae is a well-investigated model for studying eukaryotic cellular processes. For industrial purposes, S. pastorianus, which has a hybrid genome of S. cerevisiae and S. eubayanus, has been served for lager beer production. During fermentation, S. pastorianus produces ~7% of EtOH, which induces plasma membrane (PM)/cell wall stress in yeast. Therefore, S. pastorianus may experience PM stress and adapt to the self-forming environment during fermentation. However, how yeast adapts to PM stress remains unclear. Here, we investigated the temporal cellular responses of S. cerevisiae and S. pastorianus during adaptation to PM stresses by time-resolved mRNA-seq analysis. Our data showed different transcriptional phenotypes between S. cerevisiae and S. pastorianus during adaptation. The results may reflect the distinct nature of the two yeasts that have evolved in different nutritional environments. The dataset presented here would provide a promising resource for studying the characteristic nature of these differentially domesticated yeasts upon PM stresses.

Cell Membrane↗

Secretion of cryptococcal phospholipase B1 (PLB1) is regulated by a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor.

The secreted, multifunctional enzyme PLB1 (phospholipase B1 protein encoded by the PLB1 gene) is a virulence determinant of the pathogenic fungus Cryptococcus neoformans, but the mechanism of its secretion is unknown. The cryptococcal PLB1 gene encodes putative, N-terminal LP (leader peptide) and C-terminal GPI (glycosylphosphatidylinositol) anchor attachment motifs, suggesting that PLB1 is GPI-anchored before secretion. To investigate the role of these motifs in PLB1 secretion, four cDNA constructs were created encoding the full-length construct (PLB1) and three truncated versions without the LP and/or the GPI anchor attachment motifs [(LP-)PLB1 (PLB1 expressed without the LP consensus motif), (LP-)PLB1(GPI-) (PLB1 expressed without the LP and GPI consensus motifs) and PLB1(GPI-) (PLB1 expressed without the GPI anchor attachment motif) respectively]. The constructs were ligated into pYES2, and galactose-induced expression was achieved in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The LP was essential for secretion of the PLB1 protein and its three activities (PLB, lysophospholipase and lysophospholipase transacylase). Deletion of the GPI motif to create PLB1(GPI-) resulted in a redistribution of activity from the cell wall and membranes to the secreted and cytosolic fractions, with 36-54% of the total activity being secreted as compared with <5% for PLB1. PLB1 produced the maximum cell-associated activity (>2-fold more than that for PLB1(GPI-)), with 75-86% of this in the cell-wall fraction, 6-19% in the membrane fraction and 3-7% in the cytosolic fraction. Cell-wall localization was confirmed by release of activity with beta-glucanase in both S. cerevisiae recombinants and wild-type C. neoformans. The dominant location of PLB1 in the cell wall via GPI anchoring may permit immediate release of the enzyme in response to changing environmental conditions and may represent part of a novel mechanism for regulating the secretion of a fungal virulence determinant.

Cell Membrane↗

Membrane binding of beta2-glycoprotein I can be described by a two-state reaction model: an atomic force microscopy and surface plasmon resonance study.

Complexes formed between beta2GPI (beta2-glycoprotein I), a human plasma protein, and biological membranes are considered to be targets of macrophages and antiphospholipid autoantibodies involved in autoimmune diseases, such as antiphospholipid syndrome or systemic lupus erythematosus. The positively charged lysine-rich fifth domain of beta2GPI facilitates its interaction with phospholipid membranes containing acidic phospholipids, which normally become exposed by apoptotic processes. In the present study, atomic force microscopy was applied to visualize the binding of beta2GPI to a mixed phospholipid model membrane at physiological ionic strength. On supported lipid bilayers the formation of supramolecular assemblies of the protein with a height of approx. 3.3 nm was observed, suggesting a lateral agglomeration of beta2GPI. Detailed analysis of kinetic constants using surface plasmon resonance revealed that the binding can be described by a two-state reaction model, i.e. a very fast interaction step, depending on the content of acidic phospholipids in the bilayer, and a second step with significantly lower k(on) and k(off) values. Taken together, our results suggest a biphasic interaction mechanism: a fast step of beta2GPI binding to negatively charged lipids, mainly based on electrostatic interactions, and a slower phase of agglomeration of the protein on the bilayer surface accompanied by a protein-induced rigidification of the membrane, as revealed by electron paramagnetic resonance.

Cell Membrane↗