Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15527537

Using performance indicators to improve performance.

Penelope M Mullen
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The recent introduction of performance assessment within the UK NHS, incorporating numerous performance indicators (PIs) and league tables, has led to health care organisations facing large numbers of targets and a star rating system with associated rewards and penalties. However, there is considerable evidence that using PIs for judgement rather than learning provides perverse incentives and can prove counterproductive. Drawing on earlier PI systems which, supplemented by expert systems, were designed to promote learning and exploration particularly by encouraging analysis of interactions between different indicators, a series of 'mini case studies' is presented. These reveal interesting relationships and suggest explanations for variations in performance, areas worth exploring further and possible approaches to improving performance -- approaches not apparent from individual indicators and league tables. It is concluded that presentation of PIs in a format that encourages exploration and analysis could greatly enhance the potential of the current PIs to improve NHS performance.

Explore related subjects

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipCataract ExtractionQuality Indicators, Health CareUnited KingdomJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Penelope M Mullen. 2004. Using performance indicators to improve performance.. https://doi.org/10.1258/0951484042317723

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

In vivo behavior of acrylic bone cement in total hip arthroplasty.

Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement serves as the primary fixation material between bone and the prosthetic component in cemented total hip arthroplasty. In vivo degradation of bone cement may lead to a decrease in mechanical properties of PMMA and result in aseptic loosening. However, other factors such as porosity and location of the cement relative to the bone implant interface may also contribute to mechanical behavior in vivo. This study investigated the mechanical properties of Simplex cement retrieved from 43 patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. The time in vivo was between 1 month and 27 years. The variables studied included fracture toughness (KIC), porosity, molecular weight, time in vivo of the cement, and relative in vivo location of the cement with respect to the implant and bone. KIC did not correlate with time in vivo of the samples or with molecular weight. This suggests that time in vivo may not be the limiting factor in the mechanical integrity of the bone cement, A significant and inverse relationship was found between porosity and KIC. This implies that porosity is the most important factor in the mechanical behavior of bone cement during in vivo use.

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip↗
PubMed2005

Behavior of Hylamer polyethylene in hip arthroplasty: comparison of two gamma sterilization techniques.

Hylamer polyethylene was introduced in the 1990s as an alternative to conventional polyethylene. Its chemical and physical properties, and especially its high crystallinity, were claimed to improve resistance to wear. Initially Hylamer devices were sterilized by gamma radiation in air, then the technique was changed and gamma radiation was performed in the absence of oxygen. Clinical experience has shown the early loosening of some devices made from Hylamer. The aim of this study was to ascertain whether early wear and consequent osteolysis was linked to the sterilization method. We retrospectively compared 31 patients with hip prostheses with Hylamer liners sterilized by gamma radiation in air (group 1) with 30 patients with the same prosthesis, but sterilized in the absence of oxygen (group 2). The groups were similar for sex, age, disease, head diameter and material. Mean follow-up was 84 months and no clinical signs of failure were present. Radiographic measurement revealed that wear of group 1 was significantly greater than that of group 2 (0.23 mm/year vs 0.09 mm/year, p=0.001). Periacetabular and femoral osteolysis in group 1 was significantly greater than group 2. In conclusion, the method of sterilization might have influenced the outcome of Hylamer polyethylene liners.

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip↗