PubMed · 15514432
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Herman M van Praag. 2004. Functionalizing diagnostics.. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.161.11.2138
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
With the collapse of the psychoanalytic and the behaviorist models, and the failure of reductive biologism to account for mental life, psychiatry has been searching for a broad, integrative theory on which to base daily practice. The most recent attempt at such a model, Engel's 'biopsychosocial model', has been shown to be devoid of any scientific content, meaning that psychiatry, alone among the medical disciplines, has no recognised scientific basis. It is no coincidence that psychiatry is constantly under attack from all quarters. In order to develop, the discipline requires an integrative and interactive model which can take account of both the mental and the physical dimensions of human life, yet still remain within the materialist scientific ethos. This paper proposes an entirely new model of mind based in Chalmers' 'interactive dualism' which satisfies those needs. It attributes the causation of all behaviour to mental life, but proposes a split in the nature of mentality such that mind becomes a composite function with two, profoundly different aspects. Causation is assigned to a fast, inaccessible cognitive realm operating within the brain machinery while conscious experience is seen as the outcome of a higher order level of brain processing. The particular value of this model is that it immediately offers a practical solution to the mind-brain problem in that, while all information-processing takes place in the mental realm, it is not in the same order of abstraction as perception. This leads to a model of rational interaction which acknowledges both psyche and soma. It can fill the gap left by the demise of Engel's empty 'biopsychosocial model'.
The future of psychodynamic psychotherapy in residency training is in jeopardy. New priorities and forces currently aligned in academic psychiatry challenge the importance of psychodynamic psychotherapy and, by extension, its core concepts of the unconscious, defense and resistance, transference and countertransference, and the past repeating itself in the present. The exit of psychoanalysts from academic centers in the last quarter of the past century was propelled by forces including biological psychiatry, managed care, and competition from other mental health disciplines. ACGME psychotherapy competencies introduced in 2001 renewed the focus on psychotherapy training in residency and set a residency training standard for psychotherapy competency. A recent shift in academia prioritizing evidence-based medicine and a shortage of psychiatrist researchers may threaten those gains.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.