Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15490917

Selecting and using research instruments.

Deborah Winders Davis
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Many factors must be considered in planning and implementing research. Scientific reasons for decisions are important, but so are practical considerations. The suggestions made throughout this column are based on experience and may seem to some to be simply "common sense." However, the importance of these practical, common sense considerations cannot be minimized. These practical suggestions are intended to bring into focus the fact that the research process is not that different from other decision-making processes: In research as in life, there are multiple ways to get from point A to point B, and none of them is inherently right or wrong. The choices the researcher makes in designing and implementing a study must be clearly described and must be based on the research goals, the theoretical framework used, and the resources available. Potential nurse researchers should not be intimidated by the task at hand. Rather, they should be comforted by the fact that the same processes they use in making decisions about clinical practice can be employed in designing and implementing research studies.

Explore related subjects

Data CollectionEvidence-Based MedicineHumansModels, NursingNeonatal NursingNursing ResearchNursing TheoryProfessional CompetenceResearch DesignUnited StatesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Deborah Winders Davis. Selecting and using research instruments.. https://doi.org/10.1891/0730-0832.23.5.71

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Clinical relevance of rehabilitation programs for Parkinson's disease. I: Non-symptom-specific therapeutic approaches.

The idiopathic Parkinson syndrome (IPS) affects multiple structures of the central nervous system and exhibits a broad variety of clinical symptoms that are only partially treatable by pharmacological treatment. Therefore, non-pharmacological approaches are highly warranted. The aim of this study was to identify, categorize and rate studies on rehabilitative therapeutic approaches for IPS regarding not only study design and statistics, but also clinical relevance. For reasons of homogeneity, only studies applying a rehabilitative program targeting three or more symptoms were included and studies treating isolated symptoms were excluded. Study design and statistics were rated by using an established rating system. To evaluate clinical relevance a rating system was developed considering effectiveness, everyday life relevance, long-term effect, therapy frequency and setting, duration of the therapy units, effects on quality of life, and assessment. Applying this rating system to 17 studies, we found four studies with a Level I of statistical quality and four studies with high clinically relevant information. This novel method of analysing may help to gain valuable data from studies that may lack strong methodology, and may help to promote further research.

Data Collection↗
PubMed2006

Information booklets to patients' family and relatives. Survey of practice in a sample of 59 intensive care units, in France.

OBJECTIVE(S): To assess the content of the intensive care unit (ICU) information booklet delivered to patient families, and that of the general information booklet of the hospital in a sample of intensive care, in France. STUDY DESIGN: Survey. METHODS: A sample of 105 ICU was obtained at random from a national database. A survey form was sent to each ICU medical director. The ICU information booklet, that one from the hospital and the corresponding questionnaire of each participating ICU have been studied to assess the percentage of information items present which matched the recommendations of at least one of three different professional guidelines. RESULTS: Fifty-nine ICU answered. We observed a significant (P<0.01) heterogeneity by the kind ICU considered (general, medical, or surgical). The percentage of information items matching guidelines remained low (median: 41%) even if higher (P<10(-3)) than the percentage of items not matching guidelines (median: 6%). Among a panel of items we considered as important, we observed a significant discrepancy (P<10(-3)) between a low citation rate in ICU booklets (median: 14%) and the opinion of doctors who judged it should included in booklets (median: 68%). CONCLUSION: Guidelines in terms of patient and family information in ICU seem to have a mild impact on the information booklets which are also very different among the types of ICU. There is a gap between what doctors judge to be included in booklets and what they effectively write in these documents.

Data Collection↗
PubMed2006

Medicare balance billing restrictions: impacts on physicians and beneficiaries.

Beginning in the late 1980s, states and the federal government restricted the ability of physicians to "balance bill" Medicare beneficiaries for charges in excess of the copayment and reimbursement amounts approved by Medicare. In this paper, I provide empirical evidence that this policy change resulted in a 9% reduction in out-of-pocket medical expenditures by elderly households. In spite of the change in marginal reimbursement to physicians, however, I find little evidence that the restrictions affected patterns of care. Thus, this restriction on the prices charged by physicians amounted to a transfer from affected physicians to affected patients.

Data Collection↗