Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 1548617

Indications for angled implants.

Abstract

The development of dental implants has led to an expansion of indications and to perfection of implantation methods and implant systems. Angulation problems due to anatomic limitations, however, still remain. The indications for the use of angled Bonefit I.T.I. implants are described.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C M ten Bruggenkate, F Sutter, H S Oosterbeek, A Schroeder. 1992. Indications for angled implants.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90056-g

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Simulation of orthodontic tooth movements. A comparison of numerical models.

Orthodontic tooth movements are based on the ability of bone to react to mechanical stresses with the apposition and resorption of alveolar bone. Currently, the underlying biophysical, biochemical, and cellular processes are the subject of numerous studies. At present, however, an analytical description of orthodontic tooth movements including all components of the processes involved seems to be impossible. It was the aim of the present study to develop a mechanics-based phenomenological model capable of describing the alveolar bone remodeling. Thus, 2 different models were developed. The first is based on the assumption that deformations of the periodontal ligament (PDL) are the key stimulus to starting orthodontic tooth movement. The second supposes that deformations of the alveolar bone are the basis of orthodontic bone remodeling. Both models were integrated into a finite element package calculating stresses, strains and deformations of tooth and tooth supporting structures and from this simulating the movement of the tooth and its alveolus through the bone. Clinically induced canine retractions in 5 patients as well as force systems were exactly measured and the tooth movements were simulated using both models. The results show that the first model allows reliable simulation of orthodontic tooth movements, whereas the second is to be rejected.

Alveolar Process

Tissue sculpturing: an alternative method for improving esthetics of anterior fixed prosthodontics.

Esthetics associated with health of surrounding tissues in fixed prosthodontics is arduous, especially when treating the maxillary anterior region. An unfavorable relationship between residual ridge, pontic, and gingival papilla commonly compromises the final result. Alternative procedures based on biologic procedures can be developed to improve relationships and provide esthetic and functionally acceptable fixed partial dentures. This article describes a technique for the improvement of esthetics with conditioning of the tissue beneath the pontics, by displacing tissue with a treatment restoration. Lateral displacement of tissue under gradual, controlled pressure enhances the interdental papilla, which improves esthetics. The role of plaque control is also discussed in this article.

Alveolar Process

Intraoral widening and lengthening of the mandible in baboons by distraction osteogenesis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the skeletal and dental positional changes and histomorphology of the distraction regenerates and mucogingival periosteal tissues that occurred after simultaneous widening and bilateral lengthening of the mandible in baboons by a miniaturized intraoral bone-borne distraction appliance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Distraction appliances were activated 5 days after vertical ramus and symphyseal osteotomies at a rate of 0.9 mm/d for 10 days. The appliances were then stabilized for 8 weeks, after which the animals were killed. The distraction gaps and gingival tissues were analyzed clinically, histologically, and by standardized radiographic studies. RESULTS: Positional changes of the canines and incisor apices were proportional to the skeletal movements. Tipping of both incisors toward the center of the distraction gap was observed. Proportionate movement of the superior and inferior portion of the distracted segments was noted. Newly formed longitudinal trabecular columns parallel to the vector of distraction originated from the intact margins of alveolar bone contiguous with the adjacent teeth. Active histogenesis occurred in the stretched mucogingival periosteal tissues located in the distraction gaps. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this investigation support the clinical use of the miniaturized intraoral bone-borne distraction appliance to selectively widen and lengthen the mandible. The orientation of the mandibular distractors must be parallel to the common vector of distraction, which should be parallel to the maxillary occlusal plane. The formation of a bone regenerate in the alveolar region depends on the presence of an adequate bone interface on either side of the distraction gap.

Alveolar Process