Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 15485350

Proteomics.

Abstract

The genome sequences of important model systems are available and the focus is now shifting to large-scale experiments enabled by this data. Following in the footsteps of genomics, we have functional genomics, proteomics, and even metabolomics, roughly paralleling the biological hierarchy of the transcription, translation, and production of small molecules. Proteomics is initially concerned with determining the structure, expression, localization, biochemical activity, interactions, and cellular roles of as many proteins as possible. There has been great progress owing to novel instrumentation, experimental strategies, and bioinformatics methods. The area of protein-protein interactions has been especially fruitful. First pass interaction maps of some model organisms exist, and the proteins in many important organelles are about to be determined. Researchers are also beginning to integrate large-scale data sets from various "omics" disciplines in targeted investigations of specific biomedical areas and in pursuit of a general framework for systems biology.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Carmen L de Hoog, Matthias Mann. 2004. Proteomics.. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genom.4.070802.110305

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

By comparing the effects of Lactobacillus paracasei KL1 and BK56 strains on yogurt quality, the optimal consumption time for 2 compound fermented yogurts was determined.

This study investigated the effects of 2 Lactobacillus paracasei strains, KL1 and BK56, on the physicochemical properties, microstructure, texture characteristics, and sensory quality of a compound fermented yogurt system (GK107: L. paracasei KL1, Leuconostoc mesenteroides G12S, Chr. Hansen Commercial Starter Culture; G56107: L. paracasei BK56, L. mesenteroides G12S, Chr. Hansen Commercial Starter Culture), and further integrated genomic and metabolomic analyses to infer their shelf-life and optimal consumption period. The results showed that GK107 yogurt maintained stable quality throughout the 28-d storage period (at d 28: pH 4.07; titratable acidity 93.25 °T; exopolysaccharide content 0.31 g/L; water-holding capacity 53.05%; sensory score 83), and rapidly formed a stable gel structure that persisted for an extended duration. In contrast, the quality of G56107 yogurt deteriorated during the later stage of storage (at d 28: pH 4.0; titratable acidity 98.4 °T; exopolysaccharide content 0.31 g/L; water-holding capacity 51.3%; sensory score 67). Genomic analysis revealed that, compared with the L. paracasei KL1 strain, the L. paracasei BK56 strain carried loss-of-function mutations in multiple key genes associated with flavor synthesis, polysaccharide metabolism, and proteolysis, including alsS, prtP, glpO, AWC33_RS01450, AWC33_RS00855, AWC33_RS01070, and AWC33_RS01805. These mutations may have played a role in the gradual flavor deterioration, and weak post-acidification control observed in G56107 yogurt during prolonged storage. Based on the above results, it is reasonable to suggest that GK107 yogurt is suitable for long-term storage with an optimal consumption period of 14 to 28 d, whereas G56107 yogurt is more suitable for short-term storage and recommended for consumption within the first 14 d.

Genomics↗

Jingjing Zhai and Edward S. Buckler.

Dr. Laura Zahn asked the authors, Dr. Jingjing Zhai and Dr. Edward (Ed) S. Buckler, to tell us about their research relating to their Cell Genomics paper, "PlantCAD2: A DNA foundation model for interpreting genomes across flowering plants."

Genomics↗