Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 15485161

Controlled light polymerization: does it work?

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Adrian U J Yap. 2004. Controlled light polymerization: does it work?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15485161/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Thermal risks from LED- and high-intensity QTH-curing units during polymerization of dental resins.

The aim of this study was to test the ability of an infrared (IR) camera to assess temperature changes and distributions in teeth below restorations when quartz-tungsten-halogen (QTH) and light-emitting diode (LED) curing lights were used to photopolymerize the restorative material. Our hypothesis was that the higher power density and broader spectral distribution of the QTH source would cause greater increases in tooth temperature than the LED source, and that these differences would be best demonstrated with the IR camera. Cavities were prepared on human third molars and restored with a resin composite restorative material. The material was light-cured using three light-curing sources using several exposure times. The external (outside the tooth) and internal (inside the pulp chamber) temperature changes during polymerization of the composite material were recorded over 360 s with thermocouples and an IR camera. Using thermocouples the maximum increase in external temperature (+17.7 degrees C) was reported for the Swiss Master light after 20 s of curing time while the minimum temperature rise (+7.8 degrees C) was reported for the Freelight 2. Whereas a 2.6 degrees C increase in internal temperature was observed after curing 20 s with the Freelight 2, 7.1 degrees C was reported after 60 s of light exposure to Astralis 10. Infrared images showed similar trends in external-internal rises in temperature as the thermocouples, although temperatures measured by the IR were generally higher. These results indicate that the higher power density QTH sources caused greater increases in tooth temperatures than the LED source and that thermocouples may underestimate the heat applied to the tooth.

Composite Resins↗

Elastic modulus of resin-based dental restorative materials: a microindentation approach.

This research aimed to determine the elastic modulus of resin-based dental composite restoratives using the microindentation test method. Results were then compared with those obtained with the ISO three-point bending test method. Five materials from the same manufacturer (3M ESPE) were selected for the study. They included microfill (A110), minifill (Z100 and Filtek Z250), poly-acid modified (F2000), and flowable (Filtek Flowable [FF]) composites. The indentation moduli of the composites were determined using a custom-designed microindentation test set up after conditioning in water at 37 degrees C for 1 week and 1 month. The indentation test was carried out at peak load of 10 N and Oliver & Pharr's method was used to determine the maximum projected contact area. Data was analyzed using ANOVA/post-hoc Scheffe's test at significance level 0.05 and Pearson's correlation at significance level 0.01. The mean indentation modulus ranged from 5.80 to 15.64 GPa and 5.71 to 15.35 GPa at 1 week and 1 month, respectively. At both time periods, the indentation modulus of Z100 was significantly higher than all other materials. F2000 was significantly higher than Z250, which was significantly stiffer than A110 and FF. The rankings were in good agreement with the ISO flexural test. A significant, positive, and strong correlation (r = 0.93 and 0.94 at 1 week and 1 month, respectively) in modulus between ISO three-point bending and microindentation test methods was observed. In view of the small specimen size and good reproducibility, the microindentation reflects a potential test method for determining the elastic properties of dental composite restoratives.

Composite Resins↗

Influence of the power density on the kinetics of photopolymerization and properties of dental composites.

Polymer shrinkage during photopolymerization of dimethacrylate monomers, used for many years to produce materials for dental restoration, can induce either the formation of tooth-restoration gaps or the production of residual stress depending on the quality of adhesion between tooth and dental composites. In this work, the effect of the power density, used to photopolymerize three commercial dental composites (Fill Magic, Supra Fill, and Z100), on the kinetics of the reaction was investigated to determine processing conditions in which the generation of residual stress would be reduced by allowing polymer chains and macromers to flow before freezing during gelation of the polymer network. The kinetics of photopolymerization of the dental composites was monitored by real-time infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. Polymer shrinkage and mechanical properties were also investigated by using, respectively, density and microhardness measurements. Results showed that the final conversion (after 200 s), volumetric shrinkage, and microhardness values were not affected by different power densities, mainly because the amount of energy used during photopolymerization was set constant by using different irradiation times. Lower power densities were able to reduce the maximum polymerization rate and delay the formation of a rigid network. Conversion before the formation of the rigid network was also enhanced by using a lower power density. Considering that too premature gelation can lead to residual stress during shrinkage, the results of this work indicated that the use of a lower power density can be effective in terms of delaying the onset of the formation of a rigid network, providing then conditions for macromolecules to flow and relieve stress during shrinkage.

Composite Resins↗