Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 15476117

[Structural dynamics and vulnerability models].

Abstract

This paper links Janzarik's structural-dynamic coherence model with Zubin and Springs' vulnerability model and shows that Janzarik's model enables reduction of the multiple and partially speculative single factors of the vulnerability model to a functionally interpretable and coherent theory. We will then review the internal logic of the structural-dynamic coherence model concerning the explanatory power of pathogenetic models of schizophrenia and show that Janzarik is confirmed by the literature in the assumption that primary hypodynamism is present in the run-up to the schizophrenic prodrome and first manifestations. Structural dynamic derailment as a core phenomenon in psychotic disorders is also accepted and confirmed by the literature. On the other hand, the 'einheitspsychose', or unitary psychosis, basis of the structural dynamic model is controversial. In this context the author discusses his own Vienna school's Axes model, which suggests a variety of further determinants of the pathoplastic formation of the idiopathic psychosyndrome above and beyond Janzarik's model. Finally we discuss further questions which may arise out of the structural dynamic model.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Berner. 2004. [Structural dynamics and vulnerability models].. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-818464

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The inversion In(2L)t impacts complex, environmentally sensitive behaviors in Drosophila melanogaster.

Genetic variation in behavioral traits allows organisms to respond and adapt to environmental challenges. Genetic variation in behavior is often affected by many genes and thus has a complex genetic basis. Inversions, the reorientation of genes along the chromosome, tightly link genetic variants together because they suppress recombination. Therefore, inversions are believed to have a major impact on phenotypic variation because they combine the effects of multiple genes, which can pleiotropically alter multiple aspects of behavior. This study investigates how the inversion In(2L)t, found in Drosophila melanogaster populations around the world, impacts different aspects of behavior in an environment-sensitive manner. We test the activity, foraging, and startle-induced behavior of flies with different In(2L)t genotypes across sex and temperatures. We observe that Drosophila homozygous for In(2L)t sleep less frequently, spend more time away from a food source, and have a longer duration of startle response. Additionally, the impacts of In(2L)t on aspects of behavior can be sex-specific and are largely consistent across temperatures. Taken together, our research demonstrates that inversions can regulate aspects of behavior, and suggests hypotheses explaining the distribution of In(2L)t across space and time.

Behavior↗

Computer simulation of epilepsy: implications for seizure spread and behavioral dysfunction.

Hippocampal area CA3 has been one of the most intensively studied brain regions for computer models of epileptiform activity. As physiological studies begin to extend outward to other hippocampal and parahippocampal areas, we must extend these models to understand more complex circuitry containing diverse elements. Study of subiculum is of particular interest in this context, as it is a structure of intermediate complexity, with an inchoate columnar and laminar organization. In addition to helping us understand seizures, modeling of these structures will also help us understand the genesis of physiological activity patterns that are below threshold for seizure generation. Such modeling can also serve as a basis for speculation regarding the nonictal behavioral consequences of epilepsy.

Behavior↗

The role of female gonadal hormones in behavioral sex differences in persistent and chronic pain: clinical versus preclinical studies.

Clinical and preclinical studies have found sex-specific differences in the discrimination and perception of nociceptive stimuli. This article reviews the current literature concerning the biological basis of sex differences in the behavioral response to persistent inflammatory and chronic pain stimuli. The emerging picture from both clinical and preclinical studies suggests that the basis of these differences in nociceptive responses to such stimuli resides in the regulatory activity of gonadal hormones in the central nervous system. Published reports suggest that pain management targeted at female patients should consider hormonal factors during the female reproductive cycle.

Behavior↗