Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 15456013

User friendly computer profilometry.

Abstract

Portable optical profilometer for measurement and analysis of the human back shape has been developed. The driving user friendly software includes correction of distortion of the observation lens, data calibration, three-dimensional Z-axis rotation of the patient normalizing his position, calculus of the curvature map (second derivative), and precise indication of different characteristic points of the back including the spinous processes line. This instrument enables the examination of the back in both erected and bent positions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Janusz Kozlowski, Antonio Merolli, Gianstefano Monni. 2002. User friendly computer profilometry.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15456013/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Rasterstereographic analysis of axial back surface rotation in standing versus forward bending posture in idiopathic scoliosis.

The forward bending test according to Adams and rib hump quantification by scoliometer are common clinical examination techniques in idiopathic scoliosis, although precise data about the change of axial surface rotation in forward bending posture are not available. In a pilot study the influence of leg length inequalities on the back shape of five normal subjects was clarified. Then 91 patients with idiopathic scoliosis with Cobb-angles between 20 degrees and 82 degrees were examined by rasterstereography, a 3D back surface analysis system. The axial back surface rotation in standing posture was compared with that in forward bending posture and additionally with a scoliometer measurement in forward bending posture. The changes of back shape in forward bending posture were correlated with the Cobb-angle, the level of the apex of the scoliotic primary curve and the age of the patient. Averaged over all patients, the back surface rotation amplitude increased from 23.1 degrees in standing to 26.3 degrees in forward bending posture. The standard deviation of this difference was high (6.1 degrees ). The correlation of back surface rotation amplitude in standing with that in forward bending posture was poor (R (2)=0.41) as was the correlation of back surface rotation in standing posture with the scoliometer in forward bending posture measured rotation (R (2)=0.35). No significant correlation could be found between the change of back shape in forward bending and the degree of deformity (R (2)=0.07), likewise no correlation with the height of the apex of the scoliosis (R (2)=0.005) and the age of the patient (R (2)=0.001). Before forward bending test leg length inequalities have to be compensated accurately. Compared to the standing posture, forward bending changes back surface rotation. However, this change varies greatly between patients, and is independent of the type and degree of scoliosis. Furthermore remarkable differences were found between scoliometer measurement of the rib hump and rasterstereographic measurement of the vertebral rotation. Therefore the forward bending test and the identification of idiopathic scoliosis rotation by scoliometer can be markedly different compared to rasterstereographic surface measurement in the standing posture.

Back↗

Effects of backpack loading on the pulmonary capacities of normal schoolgirls and those with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective evaluation of the effects of backpack carriage on the pulmonary function of schoolgirls without spinal deformity versus those with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). OBJECTIVE: To establish if recommended backpack load limits for normal schoolchildren are also appropriate for study participants with AIS. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The weight of schoolchildren's backpacks are of concern because of effects including compromise of pulmonary function. Impaired pulmonary function is also found with AIS, but the effect of backpack carriage on the respiratory parameters of schoolchildren with AIS has not previously been examined. METHODS: Forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume (FEV1), peak expiratory flow (PEF), and forced expiratory flow (FEF25-75%) were recorded in 17 girls (mean age, 12 years) with moderate AIS (Cobb angle, 26 degrees-50 degrees) and 18 girls (mean age, 11 years) without musculoskeletal deformity during carriage of a backpack loaded at 0%, 5%, 7.5%, 10%, 12.5%, and 15% body weight in random order. Absolute values and proportions of reference values were analyzed by repeated-measures analysis of variance. RESULTS.: No interaction between load and group was found, indicating that backpack loading has a similar effect on the pulmonary function of both normal and AIS groups. However, all recorded pulmonary parameters were found to be significantly lower in the AIS than normal group, significantly so for the referenced FVC and PEF. A significant decrease in FVC and FEV1 was found with increasing backpack load, and the load at which these changes were found to be significant was lower than those established in previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary function may be more sensitive to backpack load than previously considered, especially when study participants with AIS are being considered, and the recommended loading limit of 10% body weight may not be applicable to schoolgirls with AIS.

Back↗

Active trunk stiffness increases with co-contraction.

Trunk dynamics, including stiffness, mass and damping were quantified during trunk extension exertions with and without voluntary recruitment of antagonistic co-contraction. The objective of this study was to empirically evaluate the influence of co-activation on trunk stiffness. Muscle activity associated with voluntary co-contraction has been shown to increase joint stiffness in the ankle and elbow. Although biomechanical models assume co-active recruitment causes increase trunk stiffness it has never been empirically demonstrated. Small trunk displacements invoked by pseudorandom force disturbances during trunk extension exertions were recorded from 17 subjects at two co-contraction conditions (minimal and maximal voluntary co-contraction recruitment). EMG data were recorded from eight trunk muscles as a baseline measure of co-activation. Increased EMG activity confirms that muscle recruitment patterns were different between the two co-contraction conditions. Trunk stiffness was determined from analyses of impulse response functions (IRFs) of trunk dynamics wherein the kinematics were represented as a second-order behavior. Trunk stiffness increased 37.8% (p < 0.004) from minimal to maximal co-activation. Results support the assumption used in published models of spine biomechanics that recruitment of trunk muscle co-contraction increases trunk stiffness thereby supporting conclusions from those models that co-contraction may contribute to spinal stability.

Back↗