Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15448025

Laparoscopic and partial nephrectomy.

Andrew C Novick
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Radical nephrectomy is the gold standard curative operation for patients with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Since its introduction in 1990, laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is being increasingly done at numerous institutions worldwide. In the hands of experienced laparoscopic urological surgeons and with adherence to established principles of open radical nephrectomy, laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is now a standard of care for patients with T1-3a N0 M0 RCC. Intermediate-term outcome data indicate equivalent cancer-free survival to open radical nephrectomy in such cases. Nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) is now an established approach for patients with localized RCC when there is a clinically relevant need to preserve renal function. NSS is also indicated in patients with a single, small, unilateral, localized RCC when the opposite kidney is completely normal. The technical success rate with NSS for RCC is excellent, and long-term patient survival free of cancer is comparable with that obtained after radical nephrectomy. We recently reviewed the results of NSS in 107 patients with localized sporadic RCC treated at the Cleveland Clinic before 1988 who were followed up for a minimum of 10 years. Long-term preservation of renal function was achieved in 93% of patients, and the 10-year cancer specific survival rate was 73%. Although open surgical partial nephrectomy remains the gold standard for nephron-sparing treatment of RCC, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is now available in selected cases. The optimal indications for laparoscopic NSS are in patients with a relatively small and peripheral renal tumor. In such cases, laparoscopic NSS is proving to be an effective, minimally invasive therapeutic approach with respect to renal functional outcome, with additional advantages of reduced postoperative narcotic use, earlier hospital discharge, and a faster convalescence. The laparoscopic approach is associated with longer warm renal ischemia time, more major intraoperative complications, and more postoperative urological complications. Continued efforts are required to develop laparoscopic renal hypothermia techniques and to facilitate intrarenal suturing while minimizing the warm ischemia time.

Explore related subjects

Carcinoma, Renal CellHumansKidney NeoplasmsLaparoscopyNephrectomyNephronsTreatment OutcomeJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Andrew C Novick. 2004-09-15. Laparoscopic and partial nephrectomy.. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-050003

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Survival prediction for clear cell renal cell carcinoma based on deep multimodal synergistic survival network.

Objective.To propose a deep multimodal synergistic survival analysis framework (Deep Multimodal Synergistic Survival Network, DMSSN) to achieve accurate prognostic analysis for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).Methods.This study (DMSSN) utilized matched multimodal data from the Cancer Genome Atlas-KIRC database, including CT imaging data, whole slide images, copy number variation (CNV) features, and clinical data. Deep Canonical Correlation Analysis was employed to map heterogeneous modalities into a shared latent space. Contrastive learning was introduced to enhance semantic consistency across multimodal features, and a gating network was utilized for the adaptive fusion of multimodal information to achieve precise survival risk prediction for patients.Results.Experimental results demonstrated that DMSSN achieved a Concordance Index (C-index) of 0.8153 ± 0.0994, with a Log-rank testp-value of 1.6553×10-11. DMSSN exhibited significant performance advantages over traditional statistical methods like Log-rank-Cox (0.7055 ± 0.0670) and machine learning methods such as Random Survival Forest (RSF) (0.6836 ± 0.1048). Furthermore, in comparison with similar deep learning approaches, DMSSN outperformed late fusion strategies (0.7493 ± 0.1211) and discrete-time survival models such as DeepHit (0.7655 ± 0.1041) and Nnet-surv (0.7694 ± 0.0635). Notably, DMSSN still achieved the best predictive performance when compared to the classic deep survival model DeepSurv (0.7919 ± 0.0978) and advanced state-of-the-art multimodal fusion frameworks like Context-Aware Transformer (0.7735 ± 0.0818) and Multimodal Co-Attention Transformer (0.8102 ± 0.0972). Ablation studies showed that removing any single modality led to a decline in performance, with the largest numerical decrease occurring after removing CT imaging features (C-index decreased to 0.7327), validating the complementarity of multimodal data and the pivotal role of radiomic features in prognostic assessment. Module ablation experiments further confirmed the effectiveness of the core components.Conclusion:By effectively integrating imaging, pathology, genomic, and clinical features, the DMSSN framework demonstrates superior performance and robustness in the survival prediction of ccRCC.

Carcinoma, Renal Cell↗
PubMed2026

Dual-Matrix Platform for Highly Specific Multi-Omics Profiling of Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Multiomics interrogation provides complementary information beyond single-omics approaches for improved disease characterization. To enable such multilayer profiling, we expanded the rapid functionalized mesoporous nanoparticle-coupled laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (fMNPLDI-MS) platform by designing two structurally homologous but functionally tailored fMNPs. This design enables efficient acquisition of both serum metabolic and peptide fingerprints from a total of only 2.05 μL of serum, with an LDI MS analysis time of approximately 90 s per sample, while addressing the limitation of single-matrix systems in simultaneously optimizing analytical performance for different biomolecular species. Through statistical analysis and machine learning-based feature selection, an integrated multiomics biomarker panel was established, comprising 5 peptides and 4 metabolites. Notably, this integrated panel outperformed both single-omics panels across all evaluation metrics in the validation set, improving the area under curve from 0.985 to 1.000 and increasing the classification accuracy from 0.947 (metabolites) and 0.930 (peptides) to 0.965, while showing consistent improvements in F1-score, precision, and recall. Collectively, these results demonstrate the robust performance of the dual-matrix design and multiomics integration for renal cell carcinoma classification, with potential relevance for broader applications in complex disease profiling.

Carcinoma, Renal Cell↗
PubMed2026

Enhancer-mediated DDIT4 activation by SMYD2-dependent H3K4me1 promotes pazopanib resistance in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The progression and resistance to targeted therapy, including pazopanib, frequently lead to poor prognosis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) patients. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms of these processes remain unclear. METHODS: In this study, we first performed RNA-seq to identify genes that were differentially expressed in both SMYD2-knockdown and pazopanib-resistant cells, indicating their potential role in SMYD2-mediated drug resistance. We analyzed TCGA-KIRC data and 150 patient samples to identify the relationship between SMYD2 and DDIT4 expression levels, as well as the prognostic significance of DDIT4. In vitro functional assays and murine models were applied to evaluate the effects of SMYD2 and DDIT4 on tumor growth and on pazopanib resistance. CUT&Tag and chromosome conformation capture (4 C) assays were applied to identify enhancers associated with SMYD2-mediated regulation of DDIT4, while the JASPAR database was utilized to predict transcription factors involved in the enhancer regulation. CRISPR-mediated enhancer deletion and ChIP-qPCR were subsequently performed to validate the regulatory roles of the identified enhancer and the transcription factor SPI1 in DDIT4 expression. RESULTS: Our study revealed that the expression level of DDIT4 is positively correlated with SMYD2. DDIT4 is highly expressed in renal cell carcinoma and is associated with poorer survival outcomes. Further research revealed that SMYD2 regulates H3K4me1 in a DDIT4 distal enhancer (chr10:72830412-72830891), promoting the recruitment of the transcription factor SPI1, thereby activating DDIT4 expression. We found that DDIT4 promotes the proliferation, metastasis, and pazopanib resistance of ccRCC, and DDIT4 knockdown enhances drug sensitivity in both in vitro and in vivo experiments. Furthermore, the SMYD2-DDIT4 axis activates the downstream STAT3 signaling pathway, thereby promoting tumor progression. In addition, DDIT4-related prognostic features showed potential associations with patient survival and predicted drug sensitivity in computational analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Our study identifies a previously unrecognized SMYD2-enhancer-DDIT4 regulatory axis, which promotes tumor progression and pazopanib resistance in ccRCC. These findings may provide potential therapeutic implications to overcome pazopanib resistance and improve treatment outcomes in ccRCC by targeting the SMYD2-enhancer-DDIT4 axis.

Carcinoma, Renal Cell↗