PubMed2005
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: We aimed to determine the impact of the surgical strategy used for pancreatic reconstruction on morbidity after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to all surgeon members of the Japan Pancreatic Surgery Club in December 2002. RESULTS: We received 152 replies, and the data from all of them were used in the analysis. Thirty-six percent of the 152 responders performed PD and selected from among two or more pancreatic reconstruction techniques (PRTs). PRT selection was used no more frequently in the high- and medium-hospital-volume institutions than in low-hospital-volume institutions (25% or 37% vs 35%). The incidence of both "all arterial hemorrhage" and "delayed arterial hemorrhage" after PD in the institutions that used multiple PRTs was significantly higher than that in the institutions where only a single PRT was used (4.2% vs 2.2%, and 3.3% vs 1.5%, respectively; P < 0.05). In the high- and medium-hospital-volume institutions, the incidence of all arterial hemorrhage after PD in the multiple-PRT institutions was significantly higher than that in the single-PRT institutions (4.0% vs 1.9%; P < 0.05). Furthermore, in the low-hospital-volume institutions, the incidence of delayed arterial hemorrhage, 7 or more days after PD, was clearly higher in the multiple-PRT institutions than in the single-PRT institutions (4.1% vs 1.4%; P = 0.056). Therefore, the hospital-case volumes of PD were distributed as practice-case volumes according to the PRT by the selection of PRTs, and PRT selection gave rise to higher incidences of morbidity as a result of pancreatic leakage after PD. CONCLUSIONS: The hospital-case-volume - better outcome relation for PD was attributable to expert pancreatic reconstruction skills that can be mastered only through frequent repetition.
Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures↗