PubMed · 15404168
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
P READING. 1950-01-14. Autemphysesis.. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.4645.105
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the quality of sleep and extent of respiratory disorders in patients awaiting lung transplantation as compared with a control group. METHODS: From September 2003 to November 2003, 17 clinically stable patients on the waiting list for lung transplantation and 14 healthy controls (with similar age, gender, and body mass index) were studied. Diagnostic polysomnography (PSG) was carried out for all subjects. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were included, 15 men and 2 women, aged 51 +/- 14 years. The indication for lung transplantation was emphysema in 7 cases, pulmonary fibrosis in 6, and "other" in 4. Patients awaiting lung transplantation had the following respiratory values: mean FEV1, 1105 mL (34% of predicted); PaO2, 54 mm Hg; and PaCO2, 44 mm Hg. Significant differences were found among the waiting-list patients in terms of predominance of light sleep, wakeful periods, and phase changes per sleep-hour, as compared with the control group. The recording of the respiratory events showed an apnea-hypopnea index of 6.13, sleeping time with SaO2 <90% of 1.80%, and a mean number of significant desaturations (<4%) of 6.38. There were no statistically significant differences with respect to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Poor quality of sleep was observed in patients awaiting lung transplantation as compared with a healthy control group. There was no evidence of more respiratory events or significant desaturations in these patients, probably due to the provision of supplementary oxygen therapy during the PSG.
PURPOSE: Visual assessment of the ventilation using HRCT and (3)He-MRI in patients after single lung transplantation (SLTX). Analysis of specific ventilation defects found with (3)He-MRI and morphological changes found with HRCT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 8male patients (54 +/- 6 years) suffering from emphysema and six patients (3males and 3 females, 58 +/- 9.5 years) suffering from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) after SLTX. The morphological changes at HRCT were classified and localized. In (3)He-MRI (2D FLASH), 10 to 14 slices (slice thickness 10 mm, gap 5 mm) were acquired in coronal orientation to cover the whole lung. Ventilation defects were localized and characterized. The visually estimated ventilation was recorded on a 5-point scoring system. A double threshold technique was applied to volumetric quantification in (3)He-MRI to serve as internal reference. RESULTS: We found no correlation between morphological changes in HRCT and ventilation defects in (3)He-MRI. The visual assessment of ventilation in (3)He-MRI was sufficient in patients with emphysema, but this was not confirmed in patients with IPF. The visual assessment in HRCT did not correlate with the volumetric evaluation in both conditions. CONCLUSION: The various ventilation defects were not linked to specific morphological changes. For the visually assessed ventilation in patients with emphysema, (3)He-MRI is superior to HRCT.
Traumatic pneumorrhachis is extremely rare, and a review of the English literature has revealed only 31 reported cases. We review the cause and pathophysiology of this unique entity in trauma patients. We also discuss the significance of this entity to the trauma specialist, paying special attention to the differences between air in the subarachnoid space versus air in the epidural space.