Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 1538447

Suprapubic catheter following transurethral resection of the prostate: a way to decrease the number of urethral strictures and improve the outcome of operations.

Abstract

A prospective, randomized study was done to investigate the role of transurethral catheters in stricture formation after transurethral resection of the prostate. The operative outcome after using transurethral catheters made of 2 different materials compared with suprapubic catheters was also investigated. We studied 344 patients who underwent transurethral resection of the prostate. After resection the patients were randomly divided into 3 groups: 1) those drained by a transurethral polytetrafluoroethylene (Teflon)-coated latex catheter, 2) those drained by a transurethral polyvinylchloride catheter and 3) those drained by a suprapubic polyvinylchloride catheter. At 6 to 24 months the numbers of strictures in the anterior urethra were 10 of 102 and 11 of 102 in the transurethral drainage groups, respectively. The corresponding number of strictures in the suprapubic drainage group was 1 of 94 (p less than 0.01). Strictures in the bladder neck had developed in 5 of 102, 3 of 103 and 3 of 94 patients, respectively (not significant). As a consequence of a lower incidence of strictures in the anterior urethra in the suprapubic drainage group, more patients in that group were satisfied with the results of the operation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Hammarsten, K Lindqvist. 1992. Suprapubic catheter following transurethral resection of the prostate: a way to decrease the number of urethral strictures and improve the outcome of operations.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37335-4

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Traditional Foley drainage systems--do they drain the bladder?

PURPOSE: Foley catheters are assumed to drain the bladder to completion. Drainage characteristics of Foley catheter systems are poorly understood. To investigate unrecognized retained urine with Foley catheter drainage systems, bladder volumes of hospitalized patients were measured with bladder scan ultrasound volumetrics. Additionally, an in vitro bench top mock bladder and urinary catheter system was developed to understand the etiology of such residual volumes. A novel drainage tube design that optimizes indwelling catheter drainage was also designed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bedside bladder ultrasound volumetric studies were performed on patients hospitalized in ward and intensive care unit. If residual urine was identified the drainage tubing was manipulated to facilitate drainage. An ex vivo bladder-urinary catheter model was designed to measure flow rates and pressures within the drainage tubing of a traditional and a novel drainage tube system. RESULTS: A total of 75 patients in the intensive care unit underwent bladder ultrasound volumetrics. Mean residual volume was 96 ml (range 4 to 290). In 75 patients on the hospital ward mean residual volume was 136 ml (range 22 to 647). In the experimental model we found that for every 1 cm in curl height, obstruction pressure increased by 1 cm H2O within the artificial bladder. In contrast, the novel spiral-shaped drainage tube demonstrated rapid (0.5 cc per second), continuous and complete (100%) reservoir drainage in all trials. CONCLUSIONS: Traditional Foley catheter drainage systems evacuate the bladder suboptimally. Outflow obstruction is caused by air-locks that develop within curled redundant drainage tubing segments. The novel drainage tubing design eliminates gravity dependent curls and associated air-locks, optimizes flow, and minimizes residual bladder urine.

Drainage↗